cognitive-rhythm-writing

Designs pacing in Japanese expository prose by alternating reader cognitive modes.

2|Updated Mar 2, 2019
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tunepolo/dotfiles --skill cognitive-rhythm-writing-tunepolo
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: cognitive-rhythm-writing
Source: https://github.com/tunepolo/dotfiles/tree/main/dot_claude/skills/cognitive-rhythm-writing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tunepolo/dotfiles --skill cognitive-rhythm-writing-tunepolo

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Dense, information-rich Japanese writing often reads as flat and boring because every paragraph is written in the same cognitive mode. This Skill treats pacing not as decoration but as deliberate switching of the reader's cognitive modes (observation, hesitation, assertion, re-observation) and as management of unresolved tension, so explanatory chapters, articles, and essays keep readers moving forward. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Sentence and paragraph rhythm design: Defines the "establish, flow, stop" sentence beat, alternation of assertion and hesitation, and dense/sparse paragraph waveforms. - Tension and structure management: Rules for opening hooks, section entries via counter-questions or confessions, landing enumerations on concrete scenes, and recovering open questions at the close. - Mechanical post-draft inspection: A five-step checklist (topic test, vocabulary leakage test, tension ledger, beat check, boundary check) plus a symptom-to-prescription table for diagnosing flat drafts. - Use Case: When a technically correct but dull explanatory article needs diagnosis, apply the inspection procedure to find meta-commentary ("this chapter covers..."), missing unresolved tension, or monotone assertion, then rewrite using the prescribed fixes. ## Quick Start Use the cognitive-rhythm-writing skill to diagnose and revise this Japanese explanatory article so it reads with deliberate pacing and sustained tension.

Frequently Asked Questions about cognitive-rhythm-writing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I make dense Japanese explanatory writing less boring?

Alternate the reader's cognitive modes (observation, hesitation, assertion, re-observation) instead of varying information volume. Keep at least one unresolved tension open at all times, and use the establish-flow-stop sentence beat within paragraphs.

How to diagnose a flat but technically correct article draft?

Run the five-step inspection: topic test on paragraph-opening sentences, vocabulary leakage search, tension ledger mapping each question to its resolution, beat check for runs of three or more assertions, and boundary check for mid-text second-person appeals.

What is the difference between intentional looseness and filler sentences?

The test is whether a sentence updates the situation or the document. Sentences reporting events, data, or the narrator's judgment state are acceptable looseness; sentences only describing the text itself, such as progress announcements, are filler to delete.

Can this writing method be used for texts without narrative scenes?

Yes. For scene-less explanatory prose, tension comes from the subject's own properties such as data, trade-offs, and violated expectations, plus the reader's anticipated objections. It must not be faked by narrating the document's own progress.

When should this pacing approach not be applied?

Do not shorten sentences by cutting necessary context like scope, viewpoint, or comparison axes, since that creates gaps rather than rhythm. Also avoid it when material for beats and tension cannot be sourced from the subject matter itself.