coherence-reviewer

What problem does it solve?

Reviews planning and design documents to surface contradictions, terminology drift, structural gaps, broken internal references, ambiguous statements, and unresolved dependency assumptions that would cause implementers to diverge.

Core Features & Use Cases

• Contradiction detection: Finds statements across sections that cannot both be true (scope vs requirements, architectural claims vs implementation details).
• Terminology and drift analysis: Identifies when the same concept is named or defined inconsistently across the document.
• Structural fixes and grouping: Flags forward references, ungrouped multi-concern requirement lists, and suggests logical groupings while preserving original IDs.
• Ambiguity and dependency checks: Highlights quantifiers without bounds, conditional logic gaps, unclear responsibilities, and dependencies mentioned without resolution.
• Use Case: Run during design reviews or PRs to produce a prioritized list of coherence findings with confidence levels and suggested edits.

Quick Start

Ask the coherence reviewer to analyze the attached planning document and list contradictions, terminology drift, broken references, ambiguous statements, and unresolved dependencies with confidence estimates.