skills.rest
Andreicr1
Andreicr1COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

coherence-reviewer

Detect contradictions, terminology drift, and structural gaps in planning documents via rule-based analysis.

Updated Mar 14, 2026
Search Tags:#planning#ambiguity#structure#review#coherence#terminology#contradictions
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Andreicr1/netz-analysis-engine --skill coherence-reviewer-andreicr1
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: coherence-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/Andreicr1/netz-analysis-engine/tree/main/.gemini/skills/coherence-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Andreicr1/netz-analysis-engine --skill coherence-reviewer-andreicr1

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Reviews planning documents for internal consistency, catching contradictions, terminology drift, structural issues, and ambiguity that could mislead readers.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Detect contradictions between sections (e.g., scope vs requirements) and flag conflicting statements.
  • Identify terminology drift and inconsistent terms across sections.
  • Highlight forward references, missing definitions, and structural gaps that hinder comprehension.
  • Use during document reviews to improve clarity and reliability.

Quick Start

Analyze a planning document for internal consistency and report contradictions, terminology drift, and structural gaps.

Frequently Asked Questions about coherence-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check a planning document for internal contradictions and terminology drift?▼

To check internal coherence in planning documents, apply rule-based analysis to detect contradictions between sections, identify terminology drift, and flag structural gaps. It reports conflicting statements and ensures cross-references are traceable.

What is terminology drift and how do I find it in project planning documents?▼

Terminology drift is the inconsistent use of terms across different sections of a document. You can find it by running a rule-based coherence review that highlights inconsistent terms, forward references, and missing definitions that hinder comprehension.

How do I identify structural gaps and missing definitions during a document handoff?▼

Identify structural gaps during handoffs by analyzing the planning document for internal coherence. The review highlights forward references and missing definitions, ensuring cross-references are defined and traceable to prevent misleading readers.

Can I use rule-based coherence analysis for governance planning documents?▼

Yes, rule-based coherence analysis is applicable to governance planning documents. It catches contradictions between scope and requirements, identifies terminology drift, and flags structural issues to improve clarity and reliability during reviews and updates.

What is the best way to ensure cross-references in planning docs are defined and traceable?▼

The best way to ensure cross-references are traceable is to perform an internal consistency review. This analysis detects forward references and missing definitions, verifying that all cross-references within the planning document are properly defined.

Related Skills

Explore More Content & Communication Skills→
ZeptinyZeptiny

ce-doc-review

Analyze document content for quality, coherence, security, and scope.

Community
Advanced
vtgiang-dotcomvtgiang-dotcom
3

domain-modeling

Maintain a CONTEXT.md glossary to standardize project terminology.

Community
Intermediate
udecodeudecode
434

coherence-reviewer

Identify contradictions, terminology drift, and structural issues in planning documents.

Official
Intermediate
youngeun1209youngeun1209
30

respond-reviewer

Generate rebuttal letters from Markdown or LaTeX peer review comments.

Community
Advanced