constant-time-testing

Detect timing side channels in cryptographic code by applying static analysis, dynamic tracing, and statistical testing to identify exploitable timing leaks across crypto primitives and libraries.

The best way to audit cryptographic implementations for timing leaks is using dudect for statistical measurement of timing differences and Timecop for dynamic tracing to pinpoint exact leakage locations.

Yes, you can integrate constant-time testing into CI pipelines to continuously monitor crypto code, applying dudect-based statistical tests and Timecop tracing to catch timing leaks automatically.

Dudect measures timing differences in cryptographic primitives by running statistical tests that compare execution times across secret and non-secret inputs to detect data-dependent timing variations.

Yes, you need dudect and Timecop to trace timing attack vulnerabilities: dudect performs statistical detection of timing differences, while Timecop provides dynamic tracing to pinpoint exact leakage locations in code paths.

Use static analysis for broad auditing of crypto code, dudect for statistical detection of timing differences across inputs, and Timecop dynamic tracing when you need to pinpoint the exact leakage location in specific code paths.