content-evaluation-framework

Educational content evaluation uses a 6-category rubric scoring Technical Accuracy (30%), Pedagogical Effectiveness (25%), Writing Quality (20%), Structure & Organization (15%), AI-First Teaching (10%), and Constitution Compliance (Pass/Fail). Load rubric details from references, apply multi-tier ratings (Excellent/Good/Needs Work/Insufficient), and generate structured scores with remediation guidance.

Quality assessment spans six dimensions: technical accuracy of content, pedagogical effectiveness in teaching, writing clarity and style, logical structure and organization, AI-first instructional design, and constitution compliance verification. Each dimension carries weighted importance in the overall quality score.

Yes. The framework applies across iterative drafting checks, post-completion reviews, on-demand quality assessments, and pre-validation checkpoints. Constitution alignment gates ensure standards are met before publication, supporting continuous improvement throughout the SDD workflow.

Constitution compliance operates as a Pass/Fail gate separate from the weighted rubric scores. The framework includes a dedicated constitution checklist in references to verify governance requirements are satisfied before content advances.

The framework produces a structured report containing rubric scores across all six categories, multi-tier ratings for each dimension, evidence-based remediation guidance for improvement areas, and constitution compliance verification status.

The framework includes templates and references (rubric details, constitution checklist, evaluation template) that guide systematic evaluation. No prerequisite expertise is required; the structured format enables objective, repeatable quality control.