content-evaluation-framework

Evaluate educational content using a weighted 6-category rubric.

Updated Nov 29, 2025

Search Tags:#education #evaluation #constitution #rubric #content quality

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/92Bilal26/physical-ai-textbook --skill content-evaluation-framework-92bilal26

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: content-evaluation-framework
Source: https://github.com/92Bilal26/physical-ai-textbook/tree/main/.claude/skills/content-evaluation-framework
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/92Bilal26/physical-ai-textbook --skill content-evaluation-framework-92bilal26

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a comprehensive, repeatable rubric to evaluate educational book chapters and lessons, enabling objective quality control and faster iteration.

Core Features & Use Cases

A 6-category rubric with weighted scoring (Technical Accuracy 30%, Pedagogical Effectiveness 25%, Writing Quality 20%, Structure & Organization 15%, AI-First Teaching 10%, Constitution Compliance Pass/Fail)
Constitution alignment gate to ensure standards are met before publication
On-demand reviews, iterative drafting checks, and pre-validation steps as part of the SDD workflow
Templates and references (rubric details, constitution checklist, evaluation template) to guide evaluation

Quick Start

Use the Content Evaluation Framework to assess a lesson by loading rubrics from references/rubric-details.md and constitution checks from references/constitution-checklist.md, then generate a report with references/evaluation-template.md.

Frequently Asked Questions about content-evaluation-framework

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I evaluate educational content quality using a structured rubric?▼

Educational content evaluation uses a 6-category rubric scoring Technical Accuracy (30%), Pedagogical Effectiveness (25%), Writing Quality (20%), Structure & Organization (15%), AI-First Teaching (10%), and Constitution Compliance (Pass/Fail). Load rubric details from references, apply multi-tier ratings (Excellent/Good/Needs Work/Insufficient), and generate structured scores with remediation guidance.

What are the key dimensions for assessing lesson and chapter quality?▼

Quality assessment spans six dimensions: technical accuracy of content, pedagogical effectiveness in teaching, writing clarity and style, logical structure and organization, AI-first instructional design, and constitution compliance verification. Each dimension carries weighted importance in the overall quality score.

Can I use this framework at different stages of content development?▼

Yes. The framework applies across iterative drafting checks, post-completion reviews, on-demand quality assessments, and pre-validation checkpoints. Constitution alignment gates ensure standards are met before publication, supporting continuous improvement throughout the SDD workflow.

How does constitution compliance fit into content evaluation?▼

Constitution compliance operates as a Pass/Fail gate separate from the weighted rubric scores. The framework includes a dedicated constitution checklist in references to verify governance requirements are satisfied before content advances.

What output does the evaluation framework generate?▼

The framework produces a structured report containing rubric scores across all six categories, multi-tier ratings for each dimension, evidence-based remediation guidance for improvement areas, and constitution compliance verification status.

Do I need prior training to apply this evaluation framework?▼

The framework includes templates and references (rubric details, constitution checklist, evaluation template) that guide systematic evaluation. No prerequisite expertise is required; the structured format enables objective, repeatable quality control.