content-evaluation-framework

Apply a 6-category weighted rubric to evaluate educational content quality.

Updated Dec 10, 2025

Search Tags:#constitution #pedagogy #rubric #AI-first teaching #writing quality

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/khanaleema/PhysicalAI-Book --skill content-evaluation-framework-khanaleema

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: content-evaluation-framework
Source: https://github.com/khanaleema/PhysicalAI-Book/tree/main/.gemini/skills/content-evaluation-framework
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/khanaleema/PhysicalAI-Book --skill content-evaluation-framework-khanaleema

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Provides a six-category rubric with weighted scoring to evaluate technical accuracy, pedagogy, writing, structure, AI-first teaching, and constitution compliance for educational content.

Core Features & Use Cases

Weighted Scoring: Formal rubric with defined category weights and tiered outcomes (Excellent/Good/Needs Work/Insufficient).
Constitution Compliance Gate: Ensures alignment with overarching standards before publication.
Printable Evaluation Template: Ready-to-use evaluation reports for chapters and lessons.

Quick Start

"Evaluate Chapter 3 using the content-evaluation-framework rubric and report scores."
"Run constitution compliance check on this lesson draft."

Frequently Asked Questions about content-evaluation-framework

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I evaluate educational content quality using a weighted rubric?▼

A weighted rubric systematically scores educational material across six categories: Technical Accuracy (30%), Pedagogical Effectiveness (25%), Writing Quality (20%), Structure & Organization (15%), AI-First Teaching (10%), and Constitution Compliance (pass/fail). Apply the framework to chapters or lessons to generate a final score, category-level outputs, and compliance status for publication readiness.

What does constitution compliance mean for educational content?▼

Constitution compliance is a pass/fail gate ensuring educational material aligns with overarching standards before publication. The framework enforces this as a mandatory checkpoint alongside weighted category scoring, blocking publication if the material fails to meet constitutional requirements.

Can I use this framework to review lesson drafts in progress?▼

Yes. The framework supports iterative drafting, post-completion reviews, on-demand quality requests, and pre-validation checks. It outputs evaluation evidence and recommended improvements at any stage, enabling continuous refinement before final publication.

How does pedagogical effectiveness scoring differ from writing quality in this rubric?▼

Pedagogical Effectiveness (25% weight) measures how well content teaches the subject—clarity of explanation, learning progression, and instructional design. Writing Quality (20% weight) evaluates grammar, style, readability, and coherence. Both contribute to overall score but assess distinct dimensions of educational value.

What output does the framework provide after evaluation?▼

The framework yields a weighted final score, category-level scores with tiered outcomes (Excellent/Good/Needs Work/Insufficient), constitution-compliance status, evaluation evidence, recommended improvements, and decision thresholds aligned with the scoring system for publish-readiness determination.