content-evaluation-framework

A weighted rubric systematically scores educational material across six categories: Technical Accuracy (30%), Pedagogical Effectiveness (25%), Writing Quality (20%), Structure & Organization (15%), AI-First Teaching (10%), and Constitution Compliance (pass/fail). Apply the framework to chapters or lessons to generate a final score, category-level outputs, and compliance status for publication readiness.

Constitution compliance is a pass/fail gate ensuring educational material aligns with overarching standards before publication. The framework enforces this as a mandatory checkpoint alongside weighted category scoring, blocking publication if the material fails to meet constitutional requirements.

Yes. The framework supports iterative drafting, post-completion reviews, on-demand quality requests, and pre-validation checks. It outputs evaluation evidence and recommended improvements at any stage, enabling continuous refinement before final publication.

Pedagogical Effectiveness (25% weight) measures how well content teaches the subject—clarity of explanation, learning progression, and instructional design. Writing Quality (20% weight) evaluates grammar, style, readability, and coherence. Both contribute to overall score but assess distinct dimensions of educational value.

The framework yields a weighted final score, category-level scores with tiered outcomes (Excellent/Good/Needs Work/Insufficient), constitution-compliance status, evaluation evidence, recommended improvements, and decision thresholds aligned with the scoring system for publish-readiness determination.