content-evaluation-framework

Educational content evaluation uses a 6-category weighted rubric scoring Technical Accuracy (30%), Pedagogical Effectiveness (25%), Writing Quality (20%), Structure & Organization (15%), AI-First Teaching (10%), and Constitution Compliance (pass/fail). Load your lesson content and apply the rubric to generate a structured report with per-category scores, final weighted score, tier labels, and actionable improvement recommendations.

Constitution compliance is a non-negotiable pass/fail gate that ensures educational content aligns with project constitutional guidelines before publication. The evaluation framework includes explicit constitution checklists and enforcement mechanisms to catch compliance gaps early, preventing non-aligned material from reaching learners.

Yes, the rubric applies at iterative drafting stages, post-completion reviews, on-demand evaluation requests, and validation phases. This flexibility lets you catch quality and compliance issues early during writing, perform final gate-keeping reviews before publishing, or audit existing content for gaps and improvement opportunities.

The evaluation framework generates evidence-based findings with quotes, line references, and specific artifacts paired to each category score. Results include an executive summary, detailed findings tied to rubric categories, tier labels (Excellent/Good/Needs Work/Insufficient), and a prioritized action plan for concrete improvements.

Prepare lesson content in markdown or similar text format, ensure yaml and requests dependencies are available for the evaluation workflow, and have the constitution checklist and rubric templates accessible. The framework processes your content through these tools to produce machine-readable quality reports and compliance indicators.

The 6-category rubric generalizes across educational content types—lessons, guides, tutorials, and reference material—by scoring universal quality dimensions: technical accuracy, pedagogical approach, writing clarity, organization, AI-first teaching design, and constitutional alignment. Adapt the rubric weights if your context requires different category emphasis.