One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/benediktms/overmind --skill contrarian
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: contrarian
Source: https://github.com/benediktms/overmind/tree/main/cli/claudecode-plugin/skills/contrarian
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/benediktms/overmind --skill contrarian

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Activates the contrarian persona — argues against the change; finds the strongest case for "don't do this", "don't do it this way", or "undo what was just done". Other agents handle the pro side; contrarian handles the con side.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Restates the proposal and challenges assumptions in design proposals.
  • Identifies risks, alternative solutions, and potential consequences that are easy to miss.
  • Supports decision-making by surfacing reversibility costs and ecosystem impacts.

Quick Start

Command the system to adopt the con-side critique and surface the strongest reasons against the proposal.

Frequently Asked Questions about contrarian

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I argue the downside case for proposed changes in architecture design reviews?

To argue the downside case in architecture design reviews, the contrarian skill adopts a con-side persona that challenges assumptions, identifies hidden risks, and highlights reversibility costs and ecosystem implications of proposed changes.

What is the best way to identify hidden risks and reversibility costs in a product roadmap?

The best way to identify hidden risks and reversibility costs in a product roadmap is by applying a con-side critique mechanism that surfaces the strongest arguments against the proposal, evaluates ecosystem impacts, and exposes alternative solutions.

Can I use this to find alternative solutions during architecture decisions?

Yes, you can use it during architecture decisions to find alternative solutions by actively arguing against the proposed change, which forces the evaluation of potential consequences and unconsidered approaches that are easy to miss.

When do I need a second opinion on potential risks during a design proposal?

You need a second opinion on potential risks during a design proposal when you require a dedicated con-side critique to surface the strongest reasons against the change, ensuring hidden assumptions and ecosystem impacts are fully evaluated before commitment.

What are the limitations of using a con-side critique for decision-making?

The limitation of using a con-side critique for decision-making is that it exclusively handles the con side, meaning other agents or methods are required to surface the pro side and provide a balanced final decision.