craft-critique

Reviews designs, copy, and plans with evidence-based critique and verdicts.

1|Updated Jul 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dineshrevunuru/SuperSkills --skill craft-critique-dineshrevunuru
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: craft-critique
Source: https://github.com/dineshrevunuru/SuperSkills/tree/main/craft-critique
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dineshrevunuru/SuperSkills --skill craft-critique-dineshrevunuru

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Reviews of design work, copy, and plans often default to vague affirmation or unsupported claims, letting weak work ship. This Skill enforces an evidence-disciplined critique standard that produces a clear verdict and one prioritized recommendation every time. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Evidence-Discipline Protocol: Every external claim about markets, users, or metrics must be cited, researched, or explicitly flagged as under-evidenced. - Structured Critique Framework: Evaluates first impression, usability, hierarchy, consistency, accessibility, and claim honesty, with severity ratings and a PASS / PASS WITH NOTES / BLOCKED verdict. - Stress-Test (Grilling) Mode: Interrogates plans and positioning before they are built, one question at a time, each with a recommended answer, separating discoverable facts from owner-only decisions. - Use Case: Before shipping a portfolio case study, run a critique to flag unverifiable metrics, accessibility issues, and generic copy, then receive a BLOCKED verdict with the shortest path to unblock. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to critique your design, case study, or plan using the craft-critique standard and return a verdict with prioritized findings.

Frequently Asked Questions about craft-critique

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I critique a design before shipping it?

Run the work through the six-dimension critique framework: first impression, usability, hierarchy, consistency, accessibility, and claim honesty. Each finding gets a severity rating, and the review ends with a PASS, PASS WITH NOTES, or BLOCKED verdict plus one prioritized fix.

How do I stress-test a plan or positioning before building it?

Use grilling mode, which interrogates the plan one question at a time, each with a recommended answer. Facts that can be looked up are resolved directly, while decisions only the owner can make are surfaced individually until every branch resolves.

How do I audit AI-generated content for inflated claims?

Apply the four AI-output scans: inflation scan for superlatives, fabrication scan verifying every number and citation, generic-content scan for filler that could apply to anyone, and sycophancy scan for reviews that find no problems.

What is the evidence-discipline protocol for reviewing claims?

Any claim about external reality must be cited with a checkable source, researched directly, or explicitly flagged as under-evidenced with what data would strengthen it. Confident claims synthesized from internal context alone are banned.

When should I use critique mode versus grilling mode?

Use the critique framework for finished artifacts like designs, copy, or case studies. Use grilling for plans and positioning before they are built, when reversing the decision would be expensive.