critic-loop

Run four concurrent critics and adjudication to resolve major manuscript issues.

20|11|Updated Apr 19, 2026

Search Tags:#quality-assurance #manuscript #peer-review #revision #parallel-critics #critique-loop

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/mronkko/claude-academic-research --skill critic-loop

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: critic-loop
Source: https://github.com/mronkko/claude-academic-research/tree/main/skills/critic-loop
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mronkko/claude-academic-research --skill critic-loop

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The critic-loop skill orchestrates a parallel-critic revision workflow to surface MAJOR issues in manuscripts and guide iterative improvements.

Core Features & Use Cases

Parallel critics review the rendered manuscript from four perspectives (evidence, method, argument, expert) in a synchronized cycle.
Iterative adjudication and controlled application of edits to reach MAJOR-free revisions.
Built-in pre-flight checks, render-based integrity tests, and governance to prevent duplicate work or gating.
Suitable for academic articles, chapters, theses, or reports undergoing revision after peer feedback.

Quick Start

Run /critic-loop <document-path> to initiate a parallel critic revision cycle on your manuscript.

Frequently Asked Questions about critic-loop

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How does parallel peer review work for polishing an academic manuscript?▼

Parallel peer review for academic manuscripts works by running four concurrent critics across evidence, method, argument, and expert perspectives simultaneously. This synchronized cycle identifies major issues in your draft, followed by an adjudication process that controls iterative improvements.

How do I run a critic loop to revise an academic manuscript draft?▼

To run a critic loop on an academic manuscript draft, execute the /critic-loop command followed by your document path. This initiates the orchestration, running built-in pre-flight checks and render-based integrity tests before applying controlled edits to resolve major revision issues.

Can I use a parallel critic workflow for thesis chapters and research articles?▼

Yes, you can use a parallel critic workflow for thesis chapters, research articles, and academic reports. The orchestration targets any academic manuscript undergoing revision cycles, applying synchronized critiques and iterative adjudication to resolve major drafting issues.

What is the best way to resolve major issues identified during manuscript revision?▼

The best way to resolve major manuscript revision issues is through iterative adjudication. After parallel critics surface issues from multiple perspectives, the orchestration applies controlled edits iteratively, ensuring the manuscript reaches a major-free state without duplicating work.

Do I need configured prompt templates to run a manuscript critique loop?▼

Yes, you need configured prompt templates and a fully rendered manuscript to run the critique loop. These inputs, combined with the orchestration, provide the structure required to execute pre-flight checks and process the concurrent critic evaluation cycle.

When should I avoid using a parallel critic workflow for manuscript drafting?▼

Avoid using a parallel critic workflow if your manuscript has not yet reached a rendered draft state, or if it requires minor copyediting rather than major structural or argumentative revisions. The orchestration is designed specifically to target and resolve major issues through iterative cycles.