critic

You can catch untested assumptions by applying a skeptical second-opinion review to agent conclusions. This critique identifies untested assumptions and scope drift, returning a structured verdict of PROCEED, REVISE, or HALT.

A Volkswagen pattern in test code review is a common anti-pattern where tests falsely pass under inspection. A critical review identifies this pattern by checking for semantic verification, real fixtures, and demo test existence.

You validate edge cases by applying an independent critical lens to the research plan, highlighting potential failure points and untested assumptions. This ensures methodology is sound and prevents wasted effort on flawed strategies.

Yes, an independent skeptical review checks for scope drift by ensuring plans directly address the original request. It identifies non-sequiturs and validates that the methodology remains within the defined boundaries.

You should use a second-opinion review before agent conclusions impact outcomes, specifically to catch overconfident claims and missing edge cases. This structured critique prevents executing on flawed strategies.