critique

Identify fatal flaws, dependencies, and hidden assumptions in evaluate output.

1|Updated Feb 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/cyberswat/claude-plugin-analysis --skill critique-cyberswat
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: critique
Source: https://github.com/cyberswat/claude-plugin-analysis/tree/main/skills/critique
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cyberswat/claude-plugin-analysis --skill critique-cyberswat

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Adversarially stress-tests ideas by uncovering fatal flaws, hidden assumptions, dependencies, and failure modes before commitments.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Surface fatal flaws and hidden dependencies that could derail outcomes.
  • Integrate multiple perspectives (Informed, Steelman, Skeptic, Practical, Contrarian) to stress-test assumptions.
  • Provide a pre-mortem narrative and actionable mitigation recommendations.

Quick Start

Review the evaluate output and generate a prioritized critique with fatal, serious, and notable issues.

Frequently Asked Questions about critique

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a pre-mortem analysis to uncover hidden assumptions in a project?

To stress-test ideas for fatal flaws, evaluate risks across five perspectives: Informed, Steelman, Skeptic, Practical, and Contrarian. This cross-domain risk-analysis categorizes issues by severity and dependencies to expose blind spots before commitments.

What is adversarial stress-testing and how does it find fatal flaws in a plan?

A pre-mortem analysis uncovers hidden assumptions by evaluating risks across multiple perspectives like Skeptic, Steelman, and Contrarian. It generates a narrative of potential failure modes and categorizes issues by severity to surface blind spots.

How do I identify hidden dependencies and risks before committing to an idea?

You identify hidden dependencies by applying cross-domain risk-analysis to stress-test the idea. The process categorizes issues by severity and risk, providing a pre-mortem narrative and actionable mitigation recommendations to prevent derailment.

Does this critique approach work for cross-domain risk-analysis?

Yes, the critique approach explicitly integrates cross-domain concerns to surface blind spots. It evaluates risks from Informed, Steelman, Skeptic, Practical, and Contrarian perspectives to ensure comprehensive adversarial stress-testing.

What is the best way to categorize issues by severity during a pre-mortem?

The best way to categorize issues by severity is to prioritize them into fatal, serious, and notable levels. This adversarial critique process evaluates risks across multiple perspectives to generate actionable mitigation recommendations.