cynic-judge

Evaluate code, decisions, or content across 36 dimensions with φ-bounded confidence.

2|Updated Jan 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/zeyxx/CYNIC-legacy --skill cynic-judge
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: cynic-judge
Source: https://github.com/zeyxx/CYNIC-legacy/tree/main/.crush/skills/cynic-judge
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zeyxx/CYNIC-legacy --skill cynic-judge

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a rigorous, multi-dimensional framework for evaluating the quality of code, decisions, or content, ensuring a balanced and objective assessment rather than a superficial one.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-dimensional Scoring: Evaluates items across 36 dimensions grouped into 5 core axioms (Fidelity, Phi, Verify, Culture, Burn).
  • φ-Bounded Confidence: Guarantees that confidence in any judgment never exceeds 61.8%, promoting intellectual humility.
  • Geometric Mean Q-Score: Calculates a holistic score where no single strong dimension can compensate for a weak one.
  • Use Case: Use this skill to objectively rate the quality of a new code commit, assess the viability of a business proposal, or score the persuasiveness of a marketing campaign.

Quick Start

Use the cynic-judge skill to evaluate the provided code snippet for quality.

Frequently Asked Questions about cynic-judge

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a multi-dimensional code review that avoids superficial scoring?

Multi-dimensional code review evaluates items across 36 dimensions grouped into 5 core axioms to ensure balanced assessment. It calculates a geometric mean Q-Score so no single strong dimension compensates for a weak one.

What is a φ-bounded confidence rating when evaluating content quality?

A φ-bounded confidence rating guarantees that confidence in any quality assessment judgment never exceeds 61.8%. This enforces intellectual humility during objective evaluation by preventing absolute certainty in scoring outcomes.

How do I objectively score the viability of a business proposal or marketing campaign?

You score business proposals by applying a 36-dimension evaluation framework using 5 core axioms. This generates a holistic geometric mean Q-Score that reflects overall viability without letting single strong metrics skew the result.

Can I use this 36-dimension evaluation framework for general decision making?

Yes, this framework applies to general decision making, content quality assessment, and critical review tasks. It requires adherence to 5 axioms and outputs a geometric mean Q-Score with maximum confidence capped at 61.8%.

What are the limitations of using a geometric mean Q-Score for quality assessment?

The limitation of a geometric mean Q-Score in quality assessment is that no single strong dimension can compensate for a weak one. Scores are strictly bounded by a 61.8% maximum confidence to enforce objective evaluation.

Does the cynic-judge skill require any external dependencies to run quality assessments?

No, the cynic-judge skill requires no external dependencies to perform quality assessments. It operates independently using its internal 36-dimension scoring system and 5 core axioms to generate objective evaluation results.