scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework with dimension-based scoring.

52|6|Updated Nov 24, 2025

Search Tags:#methodology #literature review #rubrics #peer review #writing quality #research evaluation #scholar-eval

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/ovachiever/droid-tings --skill scholar-evaluation

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scholar-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/ovachiever/droid-tings/tree/main/skills/scholar-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ovachiever/droid-tings --skill scholar-evaluation

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Systematic evaluation framework that analyzes scholarly work across problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data, analysis, results, and writing quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

Dimension-based evaluation rubric with quantitative scoring
Synthesis of strengths, weaknesses, and actionable feedback
Context-aware scoring and publication-readiness assessment
Reference-driven evaluation and benchmarking against standards

Quick Start

Evaluate a research manuscript by scoring each dimension (1-5) and generating an actionable feedback report.

Frequently Asked Questions about scholar-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I evaluate research papers using a structured rubric?▼

Scholarly evaluation using dimension-based rubrics scores research papers across problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data collection, analysis, results interpretation, and writing quality. ScholarEval produces quantitative ratings (1–5 per dimension) and aggregates them into an overall quality score with actionable feedback.

What dimensions should I assess when peer-reviewing a manuscript?▼

Peer review using ScholarEval covers seven core dimensions: problem formulation clarity, literature review comprehensiveness, methodology soundness, data collection rigor, analytical validity, results interpretation accuracy, and scholarly writing quality. Each dimension receives a score; weighted aggregation produces an overall assessment.

Can I use this framework to evaluate theses and conference abstracts?▼

Yes. ScholarEval applies to research papers, literature reviews, proposals, theses, and conference abstracts. The dimension-based scoring and rubric-guided assessment adapt to different scholarly work types while maintaining consistent evaluation criteria across problem formulation through writing quality.

How do I generate structured feedback from a research quality assessment?▼

ScholarEval synthesizes dimension scores into a structured report that identifies strengths, weaknesses, and actionable recommendations. Context-aware scoring benchmarks work against publication standards, enabling both diagnostic feedback and publication-readiness assessment in a single evaluation output.

What makes this evaluation methodology better than informal peer review?▼

Structured scholarly assessment using ScholarEval replaces subjective impressions with dimension-based scoring, explicit rubrics, weighted aggregation, and standardized feedback synthesis. This produces reproducible, comparable evaluations across multiple reviewers and work samples.