scholar-evaluation

Name: scholar-evaluation
Availability: InStock
Author: OwnLab

Evaluate scholarly manuscripts across eight quality dimensions with weighted scoring.

21|1|Updated Mar 19, 2026

Search Tags:#evaluation #reporting #framework #scoring #peer-review #scholarly #dimension-based

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/OwnLabAI/ownlab --skill scholar-evaluation-ownlabai

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scholar-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/OwnLabAI/ownlab/tree/main/mart/skills/scientific-skills/scholar-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/OwnLabAI/ownlab --skill scholar-evaluation-ownlabai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Systematically evaluate scholarly manuscripts to provide objective, comprehensive feedback across multiple quality dimensions, reducing guesswork in peer review and revision decisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

Dimension-based evaluation across eight core areas: problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data collection, analysis, results, writing, and citations.
Quantitative scoring with weighted aggregation and a generated report that identifies strengths and actionable improvements.
Guidance and alignment with the evaluation framework in references/evaluation_framework.md to support rigorous scholarly assessment.

Quick Start

Provide your manuscript and run ScholarEval to generate a dimensioned evaluation report with actionable improvement recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions about scholar-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I systematically evaluate a research manuscript across multiple quality dimensions?▼

To systematically evaluate a research manuscript, apply a dimension-based scoring framework to assess problem formulation, methodology, data analysis, and writing, generating a quantitative assessment with actionable feedback.

What is dimension-based scoring in scholarly peer review?▼

Dimension-based scoring in scholarly peer review evaluates manuscripts across eight core areas including literature review, methodology, and citations, using weighted aggregation to produce an explainable results report.

Can I use this structured evaluation framework for research proposals and literature reviews?▼

Yes, you can use this structured evaluation framework for research proposals, literature reviews, and reports to generate rigorous assessment and improvement guidance for scholarly work.

How do I generate a quantitative assessment report with actionable feedback for academic writing?▼

Generate a quantitative assessment report by providing your manuscript to the ScholarEval framework, which applies weighted scoring across multiple dimensions to identify strengths and actionable improvements.

Does scholarly evaluation work without external dependencies or specialized environments?▼

Yes, scholarly evaluation operates without external dependencies, using internal scripts and references to apply the evaluation framework and produce structured feedback independently.

What's the best way to identify strengths and improvements in a research article?▼

The best way to identify strengths and improvements in a research article is through structured peer review applying weighted scoring across methodology, data collection, and analysis dimensions to yield actionable recommendations.