skills.rest
K-Dense-AI
K-Dense-AIOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
Website𝕏@k_dense_aiGitHub

scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work with rubric-based dimension scores and feedback.

33.0k|3.2k|Updated Oct 19, 2025
Search Tags:#rubric#peer-review#academic-writing#scholar-eval#research-assessment#evaluation-framework
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill scholar-evaluation-k-dense-ai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scholar-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills/tree/main/scientific-skills/scholar-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill scholar-evaluation-k-dense-ai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

ScholarEval provides a rigorous framework to systematically evaluate scholarly work, delivering structured assessments across multiple quality dimensions and actionable feedback.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive, dimension-based evaluation (problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data collection, analysis, results, writing, citations)
  • Quantitative scoring with transparent weighting and a final report, enabling reproducible peer-review-like feedback
  • Integration-ready for scholarly workflows, including generation of an evaluation report alongside peer reviews and version tracking

Quick Start

Provide the scholarly document to ScholarEval and run the evaluation workflow to produce a structured, rubric-based assessment with a final report.

Frequently Asked Questions about scholar-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate a research paper using a structured rubric?▼

To evaluate a research paper using a structured rubric, provide the document to the ScholarEval framework to generate a dimension-based assessment with quantitative scores and actionable feedback.

What dimensions are assessed in a scholarly peer review?▼

A scholarly peer review assesses multiple dimensions including problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data collection, analysis, results, writing, and citations.

Can I use an evaluation framework for research proposals and literature reviews?▼

Yes, you can apply this evaluation framework to research proposals, literature reviews, and scholarly writing to yield dimension-level scores and actionable feedback.

What's the best way to generate quantitative scores for academic writing assessment?▼

The best way to generate quantitative scores for academic writing assessment is running a scoring workflow that applies transparent weighting to produce a final reproducible evaluation report.

Do I need metadata to run a research assessment workflow?▼

Yes, the research assessment workflow requires frontmatter metadata in the SKILL.md file and references to the evaluation framework to process the scholarly work correctly.

What is included in a structured scholarly evaluation report?▼

A structured scholarly evaluation report includes dimension-level scores, transparent weighting, actionable feedback, and peer-review-like assessment results for the provided document.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
yu13130122297yu13130122297

scout

Identify uncertainties in research framing, datasets, metrics, and baselines.

Community
Intermediate
Chanw-researchChanw-research
38

ppw:reviewer-simulation

Generate structured bilingual peer-review feedback across five evaluation dimensions.

Official
Advanced
Weiwei-MaoWeiwei-Mao
2

scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work across research quality dimensions with quantitative scoring.

Community
Advanced
TTAWDTTTTAWDTT
5

scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work across research quality dimensions using the ScholarEval framework.

Community
Advanced