scholar-evaluation

Name: scholar-evaluation
Availability: InStock
Author: K-Dense

Evaluate scholarly work with rubric-based dimension scores and feedback.

33.0k|3.2k|Updated Oct 19, 2025

Search Tags:#rubric #peer-review #academic-writing #scholar-eval #research-assessment #evaluation-framework

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill scholar-evaluation-k-dense-ai

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scholar-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills/tree/main/scientific-skills/scholar-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill scholar-evaluation-k-dense-ai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

ScholarEval provides a rigorous framework to systematically evaluate scholarly work, delivering structured assessments across multiple quality dimensions and actionable feedback.

Core Features & Use Cases

Comprehensive, dimension-based evaluation (problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data collection, analysis, results, writing, citations)
Quantitative scoring with transparent weighting and a final report, enabling reproducible peer-review-like feedback
Integration-ready for scholarly workflows, including generation of an evaluation report alongside peer reviews and version tracking

Quick Start

Provide the scholarly document to ScholarEval and run the evaluation workflow to produce a structured, rubric-based assessment with a final report.

Frequently Asked Questions about scholar-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I evaluate a research paper using a structured rubric?▼

To evaluate a research paper using a structured rubric, provide the document to the ScholarEval framework to generate a dimension-based assessment with quantitative scores and actionable feedback.

What dimensions are assessed in a scholarly peer review?▼

A scholarly peer review assesses multiple dimensions including problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data collection, analysis, results, writing, and citations.

Can I use an evaluation framework for research proposals and literature reviews?▼

Yes, you can apply this evaluation framework to research proposals, literature reviews, and scholarly writing to yield dimension-level scores and actionable feedback.

What's the best way to generate quantitative scores for academic writing assessment?▼

The best way to generate quantitative scores for academic writing assessment is running a scoring workflow that applies transparent weighting to produce a final reproducible evaluation report.

Do I need metadata to run a research assessment workflow?▼

Yes, the research assessment workflow requires frontmatter metadata in the SKILL.md file and references to the evaluation framework to process the scholarly work correctly.

What is included in a structured scholarly evaluation report?▼

A structured scholarly evaluation report includes dimension-level scores, transparent weighting, actionable feedback, and peer-review-like assessment results for the provided document.