decide

Run three-agent debates to produce a binding consensus document.

19|3|Updated Mar 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dirien/yet-another-agent-harness --skill decide-dirien
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: decide
Source: https://github.com/dirien/yet-another-agent-harness/tree/main/.claude/skills/decide
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dirien/yet-another-agent-harness --skill decide-dirien

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured, tri-agent debate framework to surface arguments, identify gaps, and reach a defensible binding decision.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarial steelman: Two advocates present opposing positions with strong, well-supported reasoning.
  • Moderator synthesis: A moderator identifies risks, questions, and consolidates a binding consensus.
  • Phase-driven workflow: Phases for research, round one position papers, round two convergence, and final consensus.
  • Use cases: Effective for high-stakes decisions, tradeoff analysis, and risk mitigation planning in product, architecture, or strategy contexts.

Quick Start

Provide a decision topic and supporting context, then run Phase 1 to generate position papers.

Frequently Asked Questions about decide

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I use structured dialogue to make a high-stakes architecture decision?

Structured dialogue for architecture decisions uses a tri-agent debate framework with adversarial steelman arguments to surface risks and synthesize a binding consensus document.

What is the best way to run a risk assessment debate for product strategy?

Risk assessment debates for product strategy run through phase-driven workflows where two advocates present opposing positions and a moderator consolidates the final consensus.

Can I use a multi-agent debate to resolve policy design tradeoffs?

Multi-agent debate resolves policy design tradeoffs by applying iterative convergence steps, where a moderator identifies gaps and questions to reach a defensible decision.

How do I start a tri-agent debate for tradeoff analysis?

Start tri-agent tradeoff analysis by providing a decision topic and supporting context to trigger Phase 1, which generates initial position papers for the debate.

When do I need an adversarial debate framework for decision-making?

Adversarial debate frameworks are needed for decision-making scenarios requiring structured argumentation and risk mitigation, such as evaluating high-stakes product strategy or architecture choices.

What are the limitations of using a moderator synthesis for consensus building?

Moderator synthesis for consensus building is limited to decision topics requiring structured argumentation, meaning it may not suit unstructured problems lacking clear opposing positions for iterative convergence.