red-team

Identify weaknesses in ideas or plans through adversarial analysis.

Updated Apr 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hpsgd/claude-marketplace --skill red-team-hpsgd
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: red-team
Source: https://github.com/hpsgd/claude-marketplace/tree/main/plugins/practices/thinking/skills/red-team
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hpsgd/claude-marketplace --skill red-team-hpsgd

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Adversarial analysis helps teams stress-test ideas, plans, or arguments to uncover weaknesses before they are exploited or discovered.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Systematic decomposition of claims to reveal gaps, assumptions, and dependencies.
  • Steelman and counter-argument outputs to surface strongest opposing viewpoints and fortify the case.
  • Clear guidance on when to use red-team vs council during decision-making.

Quick Start

Provide a robust critique of the given idea by identifying weaknesses and proposing the strongest counter-arguments and a steelman.

Frequently Asked Questions about red-team

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stress-test a strategic plan to find potential weaknesses?

To stress-test a strategic plan, you decompose its claims to reveal hidden assumptions, construct a steelman of opposing viewpoints, and generate counter-arguments that expose vulnerabilities before finalizing decisions.

What is the difference between a red team exercise and a council for decision-making?

Red team exercises specifically expose weaknesses through adversarial analysis, whereas council approaches provide broader collective validation for strategic options across team discussions and decision points.

How do I build a steelman argument to validate an idea's robustness?

Building a steelman involves systematically decomposing the original proposal, identifying its core assumptions and dependencies, and formulating the strongest possible opposing viewpoint to fortify the case.

When should I use adversarial analysis for risk assessment?

Use adversarial analysis for risk assessment when you need to proactively identify weaknesses in strategic options, uncover hidden dependencies, and validate proposal robustness before they are exploited.

Can I use this approach to evaluate assumptions in team discussions?

Yes, adversarial analysis applies to team discussions by systematically decomposing claims to reveal gaps, assumptions, and dependencies, ultimately producing a structured critique with recommended actions.