skills.rest
px-pride
px-prideCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

decision-council

Orchestrate structured decision loops between Codex and Claude with critique and logging.

4|2|Updated Feb 21, 2026
Search Tags:#workflow#codex#claude#decision#debate#decision-making#two-model
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/px-pride/axi-assistant --skill decision-council
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: decision-council
Source: https://github.com/px-pride/axi-assistant/tree/main/.claude/skills/decision-council
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/px-pride/axi-assistant --skill decision-council

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Enables Codex and Claude to collaborate in a structured, back-and-forth decision loop, providing critique, alternative options, and a consolidated recommendation to improve quality and transparency of high-stakes decisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Real-time critique and framing by two independent models.
  • Independent option generation and risk assessment with merging of trade-offs.
  • Decision logging and traceability for governance and audit.

Quick Start

Prompt the system to initiate a Claude-Codex decision council to analyze and decide on your stated goal.

Frequently Asked Questions about decision-council

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I use two-model decision loops for architecture and policy choices?▼

Two-model decision loops enable structured collaboration between Codex and Claude to provide critique, alternative options, and a consolidated recommendation for high-stakes architecture and policy decisions.

Can Claude and Codex debate design choices and generate a consolidated recommendation?▼

Yes, Claude and Codex can debate design choices through a structured back-and-forth loop that provides real-time critique, independent option generation, and risk assessment to merge trade-offs into a consolidated recommendation.

What is the best way to orchestrate model critique and option generation for complex projects?▼

The best way to orchestrate model critique is initiating a decision-mode workflow where two independent models frame problems, generate options, assess risks, and log decisions for governance and audit traceability.

Does the two-model decision workflow support decision logging and traceability for audits?▼

Yes, the two-model decision workflow supports decision logging and traceability, providing governance and audit records by capturing the critique, debate, and consolidated recommendation outputs.

When do I need a two-model decision council for project decision-making?▼

You need a two-model decision council for complex projects where multiple viewpoints matter, applying structured debate to architecture, design choices, and policy decisions to improve transparency and quality.

Are there limitations to using decision-mode workflows for real-time critique?▼

Decision-mode workflows require both Codex and Claude to function, meaning the structured critique, option generation, and debate orchestration cannot operate independently with a single model.

Related Skills

Explore More Product & Management Skills→
raineraine
126

workshop

Orchestrate structured design workshops with multiple LLMs and human critique.

Community
Advanced
xenitV1xenitV1
132

architecture

Systematize requirements analysis and ADR documentation for architecture decisions.

Community
Basic
huyhung9630huyhung9630
1

omc-ccg

Synthesizes advice from Codex, Claude, and Gemini for task analysis.

Community
Intermediate
jpeggdevjpeggdev

debate

Orchestrate multi-agent debates to generate and critique design proposals.

Community
Advanced