decision-matrix

Score options against weighted user-defined criteria to quantify subjective decisions.

Updated Mar 31, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/calvyntwh/karu-custom-skills --skill decision-matrix-calvyntwh
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: decision-matrix
Source: https://github.com/calvyntwh/karu-custom-skills/tree/main/skills/decision-matrix
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/calvyntwh/karu-custom-skills --skill decision-matrix-calvyntwh

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured, repeatable methodology to compare multiple options using a weighted scoring matrix, helping users make objective, transparent decisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Weighted criteria setup with user-defined priorities to reflect the user's context.
  • End-to-end decision framework including option enumeration, conflict checks, evidence-backed scoring, and an auditable decision record.
  • Use cases include technology selection, architectural decisions, and vendor comparisons across teams.

Quick Start

List options, define criteria, assign weights, score options, and review results to choose the best fit.

Frequently Asked Questions about decision-matrix

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I create a weighted decision matrix for vendor selection?

A weighted decision matrix quantifies subjective vendor selection by scoring options against user-defined criteria and weights. You list options, define criteria, assign weights based on priorities, score options, and review results to objectively choose the best fit.

What is a weighted decision matrix and when should I use it?

A weighted decision matrix is a structured framework for comparing multiple options using explicit criteria and weighted scoring. Use it for multi-option decisions like technology selection, architectural decisions, or vendor comparisons where transparency and bias elimination are required.

How do I eliminate bias during architectural decisions?

To eliminate bias during architectural decisions, apply a structured methodology that includes conflict checks and evidence-backed scoring. Quantifying subjective options against predefined, weighted criteria ensures objective evaluation and produces an auditable decision record.

Does this weighted scoring framework support audit trails for team comparisons?

Yes, the weighted scoring framework supports audit trails for team comparisons. It generates an auditable decision record by enforcing evidence-backed scoring and explicit criteria definition, ensuring transparent and repeatable evaluations across teams.

What is the best way to compare technology choices objectively?

The best way to compare technology choices objectively is using a weighted scoring matrix. By assigning user-defined weights to explicit criteria and applying evidence-backed scoring, you can quantify subjective options and generate an auditable decision record.

Can I use this matrix for decisions without predefined criteria?

No, this matrix requires predefined criteria to function effectively. Explicit criteria definition and assigned weights are foundational steps for quantifying subjective options and ensuring the resulting decision record remains transparent and bias-free.