decision-matrix

Use a decision matrix to compare vendor options by identifying weighted criteria and scoring alternatives on a 1-10 scale. This produces a defensible recommendation with transparent trade-offs and sensitivity analysis for stakeholder alignment.

Conduct scenario analysis for strategic trade-offs by applying direct, pairwise, or swing weighting to decision criteria. Scoring options and analyzing robustness to weight changes ensures your final choice remains defensible under varying strategic conditions.

Structure a weighted criteria matrix by defining your measurable criteria, assigning weights using pairwise or swing methods, and scoring each vendor. The process generates a decision-matrix.md document detailing final recommendations and trade-offs.

Yes, you can use sensitivity analysis to test technology selection robustness. By scoring options and analyzing how weight changes affect outcomes, you assess decision stability and generate a justification document with defendable trade-offs.

You need a weighted decision matrix when making strategic choices requiring stakeholder alignment and measurable criteria. It supports structured scoring and sensitivity analysis, producing a transparent, defendable recommendation for complex technology selections.