one-three-one-rule

Generate a problem statement, three alternatives, and a recommendation for technical decisions.

Updated Jun 17, 2026

Search Tags:#architecture #communication #strategy #proposals #trade-offs #decision-making

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/cxnaive/hermes-agent-llbot --skill one-three-one-rule-cxnaive

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: one-three-one-rule
Source: https://github.com/cxnaive/hermes-agent-llbot/tree/main/optional-skills/communication/one-three-one-rule
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cxnaive/hermes-agent-llbot --skill one-three-one-rule-cxnaive

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill resolves ambiguity in technical decision-making by forcing a structured, objective evaluation of competing approaches, preventing analysis paralysis and ensuring clear communication with stakeholders.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured Proposal Generation: Automatically formats complex trade-off analyses into a standardized 1-3-1 structure.
Objective Recommendation: Provides a clear, defensible path forward based on the user's specific context and priorities.
Use Case: When a team is debating between three different database migration strategies, use this skill to generate a concise document that outlines the problem, compares the three options, and provides a final, actionable recommendation.

Quick Start

Ask the agent to provide a 1-3-1 for the decision regarding which cloud infrastructure provider to select for the new microservices deployment.

Frequently Asked Questions about one-three-one-rule

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I structure technical trade-off analysis for architecture proposals?▼

To structure technical trade-off analysis, use a standardized framework that generates a concise problem statement, three distinct alternatives, and a final recommendation. This approach prevents analysis paralysis and ensures objective evaluation of competing architectural approaches.

What is the best way to compare multiple tooling options for a technical decision?▼

The best way to compare tooling options is to evaluate them against a shared problem statement and context priorities. This structured decision-making framework provides a defensible path forward by objectively comparing three alternatives before issuing an actionable recommendation.

How do I write a technical proposal for database migration strategies?▼

Writing a technical proposal for database migration requires outlining the problem, comparing three distinct options, and providing a final recommendation. This structured format ensures alignment on definitions of done and implementation steps with your stakeholders.

Can I use this structured decision-making framework for cloud infrastructure selection?▼

Yes, you can use this structured decision-making framework for cloud infrastructure selection. It facilitates the evaluation of multiple providers by generating a concise document that compares options and provides a final, actionable recommendation based on your specific context.

When do I need a structured proposal generation process for technical choices?▼

You need a structured proposal generation process when a team is debating competing technical choices and experiencing ambiguity. It forces an objective evaluation of approaches, preventing analysis paralysis and ensuring clear communication with stakeholders.