deep-decide

Evaluate decision options through diverse reasoning agents with forced dissent.

2|1|Updated Apr 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/bogdanbaciu21/skills --skill deep-decide
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: deep-decide
Source: https://github.com/bogdanbaciu21/skills/tree/main/deep-decide
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bogdanbaciu21/skills --skill deep-decide

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill aids in making informed decisions by providing a diverse set of perspectives and evidence across multiple models and research sources.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Model Perspectives: Evaluates options through independent perspectives (operator, skeptic, finance, stakeholder) from different models.
  • Forced Dissent: Ensures each perspective critically analyzes its own recommendation and presents dissenting views.
  • Synthesized Verdict: Combines the perspectives into a single, well-reasoned conclusion with considerations of dissenting views and assumptions.
  • Research Integration: Utilizes a catalog of research providers to gather evidence for the decision-making process.
  • Use Case: When you need to make a critical business decision, this Skill can help by providing a comprehensive analysis from various angles.

Quick Start

Run the deep-decide skill with the decision text and options, e.g., "Should we proceed with the new project?" and "Option 1: Proceed", "Option 2: Delay".

Frequently Asked Questions about deep-decide

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I use multi-model analysis for complex decision-making?

Multi-model analysis evaluates decision options through a panel of diverse reasoning agents, including cross-model dissent and evidence-driven research, to provide comprehensive perspectives and a synthesized verdict for complex scenarios.

How does cross-model dissent improve business decision evaluation?

Cross-model dissent ensures each perspective, such as operator or skeptic, critically analyzes its own recommendation and presents dissenting views, which are then combined into a single well-reasoned conclusion with considered assumptions.

Do I need API keys for multiple LLM providers to run research integration?

Optional API keys for multiple LLM providers enhance the research integration process, but the Skill operates using the Python standard library, allowing basic decision evaluation without mandatory external provider authentication.

What is the best way to analyze decision options from different perspectives?

Analyzing decision options from different perspectives is best achieved by evaluating them through independent agents like operator, skeptic, finance, and stakeholder, ensuring a synthesized verdict that incorporates evidence-driven research.

Can I gather evidence for critical business decisions using research providers?

Yes, you can gather evidence for critical business decisions by utilizing a catalog of research providers integrated into the decision-making process, supporting the evaluation of options with comprehensive, evidence-driven data.