Deep Research

Synthesize 30–50 sources into credibility-tiered findings with citations.

Updated Jun 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Atrium-Hermes/atrium-lighthouse --skill deep-research-atrium-hermes
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Deep Research
Source: https://github.com/Atrium-Hermes/atrium-lighthouse/tree/main/skills/deep-research
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Atrium-Hermes/atrium-lighthouse --skill deep-research-atrium-hermes

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Exhaustive, credible synthesis across 30–50 sources in a single session, with explicit source credibility tiering and per-finding confidence.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-source ingestion: ingest diverse sources and classify them as primary, secondary, or tertiary with CRAAP-lite scoring.
  • Evidence-backed findings: each finding includes a confidence level grounded in corroboration across sources, plus a falsifiable claims section.
  • Configurable depth & reuse: supports shallow quick passes or deep investigations for comprehensive reports, memory-enabled context tracking, and structured outputs.
  • Use Case: ideal for literature reviews, research briefs, risk assessments, and topic deep-dives where transparent sourcing matters.

Quick Start

Provide a topic and optional depth (default deep), then request a structured, credibility-focused research report.

Frequently Asked Questions about Deep Research

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I synthesize information from multiple sources into a credibility-tiered research report?

Multi-source synthesis ingests 30–50 diverse sources, classifies them as primary, secondary, or tertiary, and applies CRAAP-lite scoring to produce a structured report with explicit per-finding confidence levels and citations.

What is the best way to automate a literature review with transparent source credibility scoring?

Automating a literature review uses configurable depth settings to ingest sources and generate evidence-backed findings, complete with corroboration-based confidence levels and a falsifiable claims section for transparent tracking.

Does deep research support quick information synthesis passes instead of full investigations?

Deep research supports shallow quick passes alongside full deep investigations, allowing you to configure the depth to get rapid information synthesis or comprehensive reports with memory-enabled context tracking.

Can I use this for risk assessments and topic deep-dives where source classification matters?

This is ideal for risk assessments and topic deep-dives because it classifies sources into primary, secondary, and tertiary tiers while applying CRAAP-lite scoring to ensure evidence-backed findings and credible results.

How does evidence-based research handle source credibility and confidence levels?

Evidence-based research handles source credibility by classifying 30–50 sources per run and applying CRAAP-lite scoring, grounding each finding's confidence level in corroboration across multiple sources.

What are the limitations of automated research synthesis for complex investigations?

Automated research synthesis requires handling 30–50 sources per run and depends on configurable depth settings, meaning shallow passes may lack the corroboration needed for complex investigations requiring high confidence levels.