Deep Research

Synthesize 30–50 sources into a structured research report with confidence levels.

Updated Jun 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/swarm-ai-research/aeon --skill deep-research-swarm-ai-research
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Deep Research
Source: https://github.com/swarm-ai-research/aeon/tree/main/skills/deep-research
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/swarm-ai-research/aeon --skill deep-research-swarm-ai-research

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Identifying, evaluating, and synthesizing evidence from large bodies of sources is time-consuming, error-prone, and hard to document transparently. This skill provides a reproducible, analyst-grade synthesis process that classifies sources by credibility, weights findings by confidence, and outputs structured reports.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Ingests 30–50 sources in a single session with source-type tagging (primary / secondary / tertiary) and CRAAP-lite scoring.
  • Generates findings with explicit confidence levels and falsifiable claims sections.
  • Produces a ready-to-share research report with executive summary, data points, contradictions, and recommended actions.
  • Supports on-demand execution with a configurable var parameter and depth (e.g., --depth=deep for comprehensive mode).

Quick Start

Provide a topic and depth, for example var='AI topic --depth=deep', to start a deep-research session.

Frequently Asked Questions about Deep Research

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I synthesize evidence from 30 to 50 different sources into a single report?

You can synthesize 30 to 50 sources in a single 1M-token context session using the Deep Research skill. It applies a CRAAP-lite credibility rubric to classify sources by type and assign per-finding confidence levels for evidence-based reports.

How does source credibility classification work for research synthesis?

Source credibility classification works by applying a CRAAP-lite rubric to tag sources as primary, secondary, or tertiary. This process weights findings by confidence levels to ensure traceability and accurate evidence synthesis.

What is the best way to generate a research digest with contradictions and falsifiable claims?

The best way to generate a research digest with contradictions and falsifiable claims is to run a deep topic investigation. The process outputs a structured report featuring an executive summary, data points, and explicitly falsifiable claims.

Can I use this deep-research workflow for comprehensive topic investigations without prior context?

You can use this workflow without prior context, but it reads memory/MEMORY.md to incorporate existing context if available. Provide a topic and set the depth parameter to deep to start a comprehensive on-demand investigation.

What is included in the structured output of a multi-source research synthesis?

The structured output of a multi-source research synthesis includes an executive summary, tagged data points, identified contradictions, falsifiable claims sections, and recommended actions based on the evaluated evidence.

Are there limitations when processing large bodies of evidence for source traceability?

A limitation when processing large bodies of evidence is the session capacity constraint of 30 to 50 sources within a 1M-token context. Exceeding this volume may impact the accuracy of per-finding confidence and source traceability.