design-an-interface

To structure API design decisions, you provide current module boundaries and callers. The tool then generates multiple distinct interface designs, each with concrete usage examples, and compares them to recommend a single boundary for migration.

Evaluating API design tradeoffs means comparing multiple generated interface options against current repo constraints. You assess simplicity, safety, and migration costs across these designs to select a single boundary that minimizes risks for future evolution.

You need to explore multiple interface designs when significant refactors risk costly changes or when multiple public interfaces exist. This approach prevents expensive migration errors by evaluating tradeoffs and aligning module boundaries before implementation begins.

To align module boundaries, you analyze current repo constraints and generate multiple interface designs with concrete usage examples. Comparing these designs on simplicity, safety, and migration costs yields a recommended boundary for a smooth migration.

Yes, API design evaluation works for existing repositories by explicitly requiring the assessment of current repo constraints. It handles scenarios with multiple public interfaces by generating usage examples and recommending a boundary that accommodates those dependencies.