What problem does it solve? Design feedback sessions often produce vague, preferential, or off-topic comments that fail to improve the work. This Skill provides a structured framework for running design critiques so presenters, facilitators, and reviewers give actionable, stage-appropriate feedback. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Structured Critique Agenda: Defines timed phases for presentation, clarifying questions, feedback rounds, and discussion. - Feedback Formats: Provides the "I Like, I Wish, What If" method and the Observation-Impact-Suggestion pattern to keep comments specific and actionable. - Stage-Appropriate Guidance: Tailors feedback focus for early exploration, mid-fidelity, and high-fidelity design work, plus remote critique practices for tools like Figma and Miro. - Use Case: A product designer preparing for a team review of a new onboarding flow uses this framework to state context, scope the feedback needed, and guide reviewers toward actionable observations instead of subjective preferences. ## Quick Start Help me run a design critique session for my mid-fidelity onboarding flow prototype using a structured feedback format.