design-debate

Facilitate a multi-agent design debate among architect, critic, and pragmatist roles.

6|Updated Feb 13, 2026

Search Tags:#software architecture #multi-agent system #AI review #collaborative design #design debate

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/damianpapadopoulos/auto-claude-skills --skill design-debate-damianpapadopoulos

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: design-debate
Source: https://github.com/damianpapadopoulos/auto-claude-skills/tree/main/skills/design-debate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/damianpapadopoulos/auto-claude-skills --skill design-debate-damianpapadopoulos

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

The design-debate Skill addresses the issue of echo-chamber thinking by enabling a structured debate with three distinct perspectives—architect, critic, and pragmatist—when faced with complex design decisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured Debate: Spawns a debate with roles for architecture, criticism, and pragmatism.
Opt-in Activation: Users decide when to activate the debate, avoiding unnecessary escalations.
Multi-Agent Interaction: Encourages collaboration between multiple AI agents for a holistic design review.
Output: Synthesizes findings into a design document.

Quick Start

Run the 'design-debate' skill in your brainstorming session to get a multi-agent debate on your complex design.

Frequently Asked Questions about design-debate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I facilitate multi-agent debate for software architecture design decisions?▼

To facilitate a multi-agent debate for software architecture decisions, the design-debate skill spawns three AI agent roles—architect, critic, and pragmatist—to review complex designs and synthesize a structured design document after user approval.

What is a multi-agent AI review and when should I use it for collaborative design?▼

A multi-agent AI review uses distinct roles to evaluate collaborative design from different perspectives. Use it when facing complex architectures or conflicting viewpoints to prevent echo-chamber thinking during brainstorming sessions.

How do I run a structured design review using multiple AI agents?▼

Run the design-debate skill during your brainstorming session to initiate a structured design review. It requires user approval to activate and orchestrates collaboration between AI agents to generate a holistic architectural output.

Can I opt-in to a multi-agent design debate only when my architecture is complex?▼

Yes, multi-agent design debate features opt-in activation, allowing users to decide when to trigger the review. This avoids unnecessary escalations and ensures the three-role process is reserved for complex architecture decisions.

What is the best way to avoid echo-chamber thinking in software architecture reviews?▼

The best way to avoid echo-chamber thinking in software architecture reviews is to use a structured debate with distinct perspectives. Assigning architect, critic, and pragmatist roles ensures conflicting viewpoints are thoroughly evaluated.

What output do I get from a multi-agent collaborative design debate?▼

The output from a multi-agent collaborative design debate is a structured design document. This document synthesizes the findings and interactions from the architect, critic, and pragmatist AI agents following user approval.