dev-physics-review

Review physics lesson code, tests, and documentation before dev-final-pass.

Updated Mar 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/code-review-benchmark/coderabbit_prs2__forge-gpu__coderabbit__PR323__20260317 --skill dev-physics-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: dev-physics-review
Source: https://github.com/code-review-benchmark/coderabbit_prs2__forge-gpu__coderabbit__PR323__20260317/tree/main/.claude/skills/dev-physics-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/code-review-benchmark/coderabbit_prs2__forge-gpu__coderabbit__PR323__20260317 --skill dev-physics-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill performs a physics-specific quality review of a physics lesson prior to the dev-final-pass, catching issues in code, tests, and documentation to raise reliability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Physics-focused code correctness, verification, and documentation checks for Forge Physics headers and related lesson code.
  • Phase-guided review workflow with exhaustive findings, fixes, and revalidation before proceeding.
  • Clear guidance for authors on how to respond to issues and improve lesson quality across the physics track.

Quick Start

Run the physics review on the target lesson directory and follow the three-phase workflow to identify, fix, and revalidate issues before dev-final-pass.

Frequently Asked Questions about dev-physics-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review physics code quality before a final pass?

To review physics code quality before a final pass, run a physics-specific quality review on your lesson directory to catch code, test, and documentation issues using a phase-guided workflow with mandatory revalidation.

What does a physics-focused code review check for in Forge Physics headers?

A physics-focused code review checks Forge Physics headers and related lesson code for correctness, verification gaps, and documentation issues to ensure reliability before proceeding to final validation.

How do I run a phase-guided quality review on physics lesson code?

Run a phase-guided quality review on physics lesson code by following a three-phase workflow to identify exhaustive findings, apply fixes, and revalidate issues before executing the dev-final-pass.

Does the physics quality review enforce exhaustive test coverage for physics lessons?

Yes, the physics quality review requires explicit, deterministic workflows and enforces thorough test coverage across exhaustive, phase-based checks to validate physics lesson code reliability.