Verified:GitHub

devils-advocate

Generate adversarial peer review challenges for economics and political science research papers.

21|4|Updated Mar 14, 2026

Search Tags:#research design #devil's advocate #peer review #research critique #adversarial attack #identification strategy

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/HaipingXu/social-science-claude-scholar --skill devils-advocate-haipingxu

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: devils-advocate
Source: https://github.com/HaipingXu/social-science-claude-scholar/tree/main/skills/devils-advocate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/HaipingXu/social-science-claude-scholar --skill devils-advocate-haipingxu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps researchers identify potential weaknesses and vulnerabilities in their research design, empirical strategy, or paper before it faces peer review.

Core Features & Use Cases

Adversarial Critique: Generates specific, challenging questions from the perspective of a hostile referee.
Targeted Weakness Identification: Focuses on identification, external validity, mechanism, measurement, specification, literature, and magnitude challenges.
Use Case: After drafting a paper on a new causal inference strategy, use this skill to anticipate referee objections and proactively strengthen the paper's arguments and evidence.

Quick Start

Ask the devils-advocate skill to challenge my research design for the paper on minimum wage effects.

Frequently Asked Questions about devils-advocate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I anticipate peer review objections to my research design?▼

To anticipate peer review objections, you can simulate a hostile peer review that generates 5-7 specific adversarial challenges targeting your identification strategy, theoretical mechanism, and empirical design.

What is an adversarial attack on a research paper's identification strategy?▼

An adversarial attack on an identification strategy critically evaluates your research design by generating specific challenging questions to preempt referee objections regarding external validity, measurement, and specification.

How do I stress-test my causal inference strategy before submission?▼

To stress-test your causal inference strategy, apply an adversarial critique mechanism that targets potential weaknesses in your empirical design and literature to proactively strengthen your paper's arguments.

Can I use this to simulate peer review for political science papers?▼

Yes, you can simulate peer review for political science papers as the adversarial critique specifically supports academic researchers in economics and political science by targeting identification and magnitude challenges.

What is the best way to find empirical design weaknesses in my economics research?▼

The best way to find empirical design weaknesses is to generate targeted adversarial attacks focusing on measurement, specification, and theoretical mechanisms to identify vulnerabilities before peer review.

When should I not use an adversarial critique for my research paper?▼

You should not use an adversarial critique if your research paper lacks a defined identification strategy or empirical design, as the tool specifically targets these structural elements to preempt referee objections.