diff-audit

To categorize PR diffs and enforce scope, you audit changes on a per-file basis, classifying each file as in-scope, mechanical update, or test. This structured triage surfaces out-of-scope edits for reviewers to flag or revert.

The best way to review large PR diffs is to generate a concise triage report that provides per-file categorization and justification notes. This accelerates reviewer decisions by highlighting scope issues across bulk PRs.

You flag scope issues in feature and maintenance PRs by capturing rationale for each flagged file change during the diff audit. This enforces scope discipline by highlighting out-of-scope edits for team discussion.

Yes, you can use diff triage to generate justification notes for code review artifacts. The audit process captures the rationale for each file categorization, creating a structured record for review decisions.

Diff auditing works for mechanical updates and test files by specifically categorizing them during the review process. This classification helps distinguish necessary structural changes from actual feature scope deviations.