differential-review

To identify security regressions in a PR diff, you run a differential review workflow. It analyzes baseline context, maps blast radius, and applies adversarial modeling to surface vulnerabilities and attack-surface changes.

A differential security audit analyzes code diffs to pinpoint newly introduced vulnerabilities. It guides reviewers through a structured workflow encompassing triage, deep context analysis, and adversarial modeling to ensure consistent artifact-driven reviews.

Performing a security audit on large codebases uses a phase-by-phase analysis workflow. It scales to handle large diffs by establishing baseline context, evaluating blast radius, and producing a comprehensive audit report.

Yes, differential review is applicable to diffs across both large and small codebases. The phase-based triage and analysis workflow scales to guide security teams through code analysis, blast radius evaluation, and reporting regardless of project size.

Yes, you can generate a comprehensive markdown audit report after completing the code diff analysis. The workflow supports handoff to issue-writer for stakeholder communication, ensuring artifact-driven audit results are documented.