discovery.problem_framing

Frame customer problems with evidence and success hypotheses before solutioning.

Updated Nov 3, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/edwardmonteiro/Aiskillinpractice --skill discovery-problem-framing
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: discovery.problem_framing
Source: https://github.com/edwardmonteiro/Aiskillinpractice/tree/main/skills/discovery/problem_framing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/edwardmonteiro/Aiskillinpractice --skill discovery-problem-framing

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps product managers clearly define the core customer problem, gather supporting evidence, and articulate a success hypothesis before solutioning, ensuring focused discovery.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Problem Statement: Build a concise problem statement referencing evidence sources.
  • Evidence Summary: Map supporting insights into a table with source, signal, confidence, and relevance.
  • Use Case: Use this Skill to frame the problem of "low user retention" for the "mobile app" product, backed by recent user interview data, to guide the next quarter's discovery efforts.

Quick Start

Use the problem_framing skill for the "Atlas" product, targeting the "Operations Lead" segment, using "customer interviews, survey data" as evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions about discovery.problem_framing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I frame a customer problem before starting product discovery?

Problem framing involves building a concise problem statement backed by evidence sources, creating an evidence summary with confidence levels, and articulating a success hypothesis. This ensures your discovery efforts target the right customer segment with validated insights rather than assumptions.

What should I include in a problem statement for product discovery?

A problem statement references specific evidence sources, identifies the affected customer segment, and articulates the core issue. Include supporting data from customer interviews, surveys, or usage patterns to ground the statement in reality and align stakeholders on what you're solving.

How do I validate a customer problem across different product segments?

Map evidence from multiple sources—interviews, surveys, usage data—into a table showing source, signal, confidence level, and relevance to each segment. This approach reveals whether the problem is universal or segment-specific, guiding which initiatives to prioritize.

What's the difference between a problem statement and a success hypothesis?

A problem statement describes the core customer issue with supporting evidence. A success hypothesis predicts the outcome if you solve that problem—how metrics, behavior, or satisfaction will change. Together they create a testable framework for discovery.

When should I use problem framing in my product workflow?

Use problem framing early in discovery, before ideating solutions. It's most effective when you have access to customer interviews, survey data, or usage signals and need to align teams on what problem to solve for a specific product or segment.

Can I use problem framing with limited evidence sources?

Yes. Problem framing works with whatever evidence you have—even one customer interview or internal usage metric. The evidence summary will show lower confidence levels for sparse data, making clear what additional research is needed before committing to a solution.