discuss

Coordinates multi-role discussions and auto-saves results to .artifacts/ on trigger events.

Updated Jul 5, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sqfzy/my_configs --skill discuss-sqfzy
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: discuss
Source: https://github.com/sqfzy/my_configs/tree/main/claude/skills/discuss
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sqfzy/my_configs --skill discuss-sqfzy

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Structured adversarial multi-role discussions that converge on well-tested solutions, auto-saving results to the .artifacts/ directory when triggers occur (weigh tradeoffs, compare approaches, debate a technical decision, or seek structured pros/cons analysis before choosing a direction).

Core Features & Use Cases

  • A formal, multi-role discussion framework coordinating multiple perspectives to surface robust decisions.
  • Auto-save of discussion artifacts to the .artifacts/ directory when certain triggers are met.
  • Clear governance to avoid scope creep and ensure transparent decision-making.

Quick Start

Provide a topic and optional parameters for rounds and roles to initiate a structured discussion and let the workflow guide argumentation toward convergence.

Frequently Asked Questions about discuss

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I facilitate a structured technical discussion to evaluate architecture tradeoffs?

This Skill coordinates multi-role discussions to evaluate architecture tradeoffs, automatically saving the converged decision results and arguments to the .artifacts/ directory when specific triggers like weighing approaches are met.

What is a multi-role debate framework for engineering design reviews?

It provides a formal multi-role discussion framework that coordinates multiple perspectives to surface robust engineering decisions, ensuring transparent governance and avoiding scope creep during design reviews.

How do I auto-save decision artifacts when comparing technical approaches?

You can auto-save decision artifacts when comparing technical approaches by triggering the discussion workflow, which automatically persists the tradeoff analysis and converged decisions into the .artifacts/ directory.

Can I customize the roles and rounds in a structured pros and cons analysis?

Yes, you can customize roles and rounds in a structured pros and cons analysis by providing optional parameters when initiating the discussion, allowing the workflow to guide argumentation toward convergence.

Does this discussion workflow support loading external references and scripts?

Yes, the discussion workflow supports loading external references and scripts through optional resources defined in the scripts/, references/, and assets/ directories, loaded as needed by the discussion plan.

When should I avoid using a convergent multi-role discussion for decision-making?

You should avoid using convergent multi-role discussion for decision-making if your task does not require weighing tradeoffs, comparing approaches, or debating technical decisions before coding or implementation.