doc-research-improvements

Analyze architecture documents to extract goals, dependencies, and propose ranked improvements.

20|4|Updated Nov 9, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/anderskev/amelia --skill doc-research-improvements
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: doc-research-improvements
Source: https://github.com/anderskev/amelia/tree/main/.claude/skills/doc-research-improvements
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/anderskev/amelia --skill doc-research-improvements

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enables rapid critique and enhancement of Amelia architecture or idea documents by performing focused analysis, identifying gaps, locating external sources, and proposing concrete improvements along with OSS candidates.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Ingest and analyze architecture or idea docs to summarize goals, scope, assumptions, and dependencies.
  • Extract concepts and techniques (ex: LangGraph, FastAPI, SQLite) and classify them as architecture, process, data, evaluation, or UI.
  • Research and cite sources from authoritative docs and standards to validate proposals.
  • Propose improvements with prioritized actions, tradeoffs, risks, and module touchpoints.
  • Recommend OSS candidates with licenses, maturity, integration notes, and compatibility.

Quick Start

Provide the path to the design/document to analyze, for example: doc_path: "docs/architecture/amelia_arch.md" You can also supply raw doc content via doc_text and optional parameters like focus_areas and depth.

Frequently Asked Questions about doc-research-improvements

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I analyze architecture documents to identify design improvements?

Architecture document analysis extracts goals, scope, and dependencies to surface improvement opportunities. This Skill ingests design docs, classifies technologies involved, validates proposals with citations, and delivers ranked improvements with OSS candidates and tradeoffs.

Can I get research-backed improvement suggestions for my design documentation?

Yes. The Skill performs focused critique by researching authoritative sources, citing evidence, and proposing concrete enhancements. It identifies gaps, recommends open-source alternatives, and maps module touchpoints affected by each improvement.

What frameworks and technologies can this analyze in my architecture docs?

The Skill extracts and classifies frameworks, libraries, and platforms mentioned in your documentation—such as LangGraph, FastAPI, and SQLite—categorizing them as architecture, process, data, evaluation, or UI components to validate alignment with goals.

How do I extract concepts and dependencies from a design document?

Supply the document path or raw text. The Skill ingests the content, extracts technical concepts and their classifications, identifies assumptions and dependencies, and outputs structured snapshots and concept lists for further analysis.

What output do I get after analyzing a design document?

You receive a Doc Snapshot, Extracted Concepts, Evidence and Research Notes with citations, ranked Improvements with tradeoffs and risks, OSS Candidates with licenses and maturity levels, and Open Questions requiring investigation.

Can this Skill find open-source alternatives for my architecture design?

Yes. After analyzing your document, the Skill recommends OSS candidates with license information, maturity assessment, integration notes, and compatibility details to support architecture decisions with concrete alternatives.