What problem does it solve? Researchers often lack an honest, experienced reviewer before committing months to an idea or submitting a paper. This Skill acts as a senior professor who diagnoses research ideas and pre-submission drafts, identifying fatal flaws and giving clear go/no-go verdicts without rewriting the work itself. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Idea Evaluation: Scores a research idea across five dimensions (accuracy, speed, robustness, cost, breadth), checks ten classes of fatal flaws, verifies novelty via scholar_search, and concludes with "worth doing / revise first / change direction". - Pre-Submission Review: Reviews a finished draft layer by layer (logic chain, claim-evidence alignment, novelty, language, AI-tone patterns, figures, LaTeX formatting), ranking every issue as critical, major, or minor with exact locations in the text. - Cross-Disciplinary Frameworks: Routes non-STEM work (humanities, social science, finance/economics, law) to domain-appropriate evaluation dimensions and fatal-flaw lists instead of applying STEM criteria. - Use Case: Before submitting to a conference, paste your draft and ask for a review; you receive a prioritized issue list with quoted evidence, concrete fixes, and a clear submission recommendation. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to review your attached paper draft before submission and list the critical issues that could cause rejection.
