What problem does it solve?
Structured, high-quality reviews are essential for selecting and improving systems research. This Skill provides a comprehensive framework, templates, and best-practice guidance to produce thoughtful, constructive, and policy-aligned reviews for systems conference papers.
Core Features & Use Cases
- HotCRP-aligned evaluation fields: Overall Merit, Reviewer Confidence, Paper Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, Detailed Comments, Questions for Authors, Minor Issues.
- Seven-dimension assessment: Novelty, Technical Soundness, Significance, Evaluation, Presentation, Relevance, Reproducibility, with venue-specific rubrics.
- Safety and tone guidance: constructive feedback, ethics, and reviewer conduct to improve outcomes for authors and programs.
- Multi-perspective generation: supports simulating expert, knowledgeable, familiar, and limited-knowledge reviews for diverse PC perspectives.
- Teaching and onboarding: useful as course material or training for new reviewers to learn standard evaluation practices and write high-quality feedback.
Quick Start
Begin by loading a paper’s title and abstract, then fill in the seven HotCRP fields and the seven evaluation dimensions to generate a complete review.