skills.rest
OniReimu
OniReimuCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

paper-reviewer

Generate structured, evidence-based peer reviews for academic manuscripts.

26|3|Updated Jan 24, 2026
Search Tags:#academic review#scientific writing#peer review#research evaluation#manuscript analysis#evidence-based feedback
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/OniReimu/Ageaf --skill paper-reviewer-onireimu
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: paper-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/OniReimu/Ageaf/tree/main/public/skills/custom/paper-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/OniReimu/Ageaf --skill paper-reviewer-onireimu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the generation of comprehensive, evidence-based peer reviews for academic papers, ensuring objectivity and adherence to high-quality venue standards.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Review Generation: Produces reviews with specific sections (Synopsis, Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, Suggestions, References).
  • Evidence-Based Claims: Anchors all feedback to specific parts of the manuscript (tables, figures, sections).
  • Use Case: A researcher needs to submit a manuscript to a top-tier conference. They can use this Skill to generate a detailed, constructive peer review that mirrors the expectations of senior reviewers, helping them refine their paper before submission.

Quick Start

Use the paper-reviewer skill to review the attached manuscript.

Frequently Asked Questions about paper-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a structured peer review for an academic manuscript?▼

To generate a structured peer review, submit your academic manuscript to the paper-reviewer skill. It analyzes the text and outputs an evidence-based review containing sections for Synopsis, Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, and Suggestions.

Can I get feedback on my research paper before submitting to a top-tier venue?▼

Yes, you can get research evaluation feedback before submission. The skill mirrors senior reviewer expectations from top-tier venues, providing objective critiques anchored to specific manuscript evidence like tables and figures to help refine your paper.

How does evidence-based feedback work for manuscript analysis?▼

Evidence-based feedback works by anchoring all critiques to specific parts of the manuscript. Instead of general comments, the review identifies exact tables, figures, or sections to ensure objective evaluation of your research contribution.

Does the generated academic review include an accept or reject decision?▼

No, the generated academic review does not include accept or reject decisions. It focuses entirely on producing objective critiques and constructive suggestions, deliberately omitting scores to adhere to high-quality publication venue standards.

What is the best way to evaluate a research contribution for publication?▼

The best way to evaluate a research contribution is to request a manuscript analysis. The skill assesses the paper against top-tier venue standards, generating a comprehensive review that highlights strengths and weaknesses without making final publication decisions.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
AvaivartikaAvaivartika
1

paper-reviewer

Generate six-section peer reviews with evidence anchors for academic manuscripts.

Community
Advanced
Cuki2910Cuki2910
1

critical-transport-editor

Review transportation and green transition research manuscripts for methodological weaknesses.

Community
Advanced
dangelesdangeles
6

fact-checker

Cross-reference claims against trusted sources and generate structured verification reports.

Community
Advanced
aviskaaraviskaar
6

research-paper-review

Critique AI/ML research papers across methodology, experiments, and limitations.

Official
Basic