paper-reviewer

Generate six-section peer reviews with evidence anchors for academic manuscripts.

1|Updated Apr 23, 2026

Search Tags:#academic #manuscript #peer-review #structured-review #evidence-anchoring #manuscript-analysis

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/Avaivartika/jiaoleaf-ai --skill paper-reviewer-avaivartika

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: paper-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/Avaivartika/jiaoleaf-ai/tree/main/extension/skills/custom/paper-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Avaivartika/jiaoleaf-ai --skill paper-reviewer-avaivartika

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps users generate rigorous, evidence-based reviews of academic manuscripts without deriving scores or making accept/reject decisions, providing clear guidance for authors and editors.

Core Features & Use Cases

Six-section review template: always outputs Synopsis of the paper, Summary of Review, Strengths, Weaknesses, Suggestions for Improvement, and References with explicit evidence anchors.
Deterministic structure and tone: preserves objectivity and ensures citation to manuscript sections (tables, figures, sections) for every claim.
Use Cases: for authors seeking feedback, editors performing manuscript triage, or students learning peer-review best practices.

Quick Start

Paste the manuscript text and ask for a structured six-section peer review.

Frequently Asked Questions about paper-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I get a structured peer review of my academic manuscript?▼

To get a structured peer review, paste your academic manuscript text and request a review. The output provides a formal six-section analysis, including strengths, weaknesses, and suggestions, without assigning an accept or reject score.

What is evidence anchoring in a manuscript analysis?▼

Evidence anchoring in manuscript analysis requires citing specific sections, figures, tables, or references for every claim made. This ensures the peer review remains objective and verifiable against the submitted text.

Can I use this to triage manuscripts for an academic journal?▼

Yes, editors can use this structured manuscript analysis for triage. It delivers a deterministic synopsis and review summary with cited evidence, helping assess submissions without generating final accept or reject decisions.

How do I generate a manuscript review that cites specific figures and tables?▼

To generate a review citing figures and tables, provide the full manuscript text to the reviewer. The analysis mandates evidence anchoring, explicitly referencing manuscript sections and tables to support every evaluative claim.

Does peer review software automatically assign an accept or reject score?▼

This peer review approach does not assign scores or make accept and reject decisions. It focuses purely on providing formal, evidence-based feedback and suggestions for improvement to guide authors and editors.

What sections are included in a structured academic manuscript review?▼

A structured academic manuscript review includes six sections: Synopsis, Summary of Review, Strengths, Weaknesses, Suggestions for Improvement, and References. Every section relies on deterministic structure and objective evidence anchoring.