What problem does it solve? Writing fair, evidence-grounded manager performance reviews is time-consuming and error-prone: managers must synthesize self reviews, 1:1 notes, objectives, and calibration context while matching a specific voice and form structure. This Skill produces paste-ready review fields that stay traceable to evidence and consistent with Mutt's review conventions. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Evidence-grounded assessment: Reads self reviews, objectives, 1:1 notes, stakeholder feedback, and role expectations, distinguishing reported outcomes from inferences and keeping post-period events out of the rating. - Competency matrix alignment: Inspects the current Mutt competency matrix to assess the employee's exact track and step (e.g., IC4, M3) against rubric expectations. - Mid-year and annual cadence handling: Adjusts depth and scope for lightweight mid-year checkpoints versus comprehensive annual reviews, and assesses promotion readiness independently from performance ratings. - Voice-matched Spanish drafting: Applies the manager's established candid Argentine-Spanish voice from references/voice.md to manager-authored fields, with separate public feedback and private calibration comments. - Use Case: A manager needs to complete a mid-year review for a direct report. Provide the self review, 1:1 notes, and objectives, and receive paste-ready General Feedback, Orientation Score, Promotion label, and a private calibration comment. ## Quick Start Draft a mid-year performance review for my direct report using the attached self review, 1:1 notes, and objectives, following the Mutt form fields.
