drive-review

Reviews project deliverables against acceptance criteria and plan compliance with severity-rated findings.

Updated Jul 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hivgb1-ai/do-better-workspace-v2 --skill drive-review-hivgb1-ai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: drive-review
Source: https://github.com/hivgb1-ai/do-better-workspace-v2/tree/main/.claude/skills/drive-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hivgb1-ai/do-better-workspace-v2 --skill drive-review-hivgb1-ai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? When producing deliverables (documents, content, plans), creators tend to approve their own work too easily. This Skill acts as a strict review gate that prevents rubber-stamping by requiring evidence-based judgments before any output moves to the publishing stage. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Dual-axis review: Checks quality against predefined acceptance criteria (Axis A) and audits plan fulfillment item-by-item (Axis B), rating each as complete, partial, missing, done differently, or unverifiable. - Severity-rated findings: Classifies every finding as high, medium, or polish, then issues an overall verdict of pass, conditional pass, or fail with documented reasoning. - Parallel independent review: For large deliverables, spawns sub-agents from multiple angles (recipient perspective, criteria alignment, adversarial critique) and prioritizes findings confirmed by multiple angles. - Use Case: After drafting a multi-part content series, run this Skill to verify each piece meets the acceptance criteria, confirm the distribution path is connected, and route major gaps back to the planning or production stage. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to review the deliverable produced in the previous stage by saying "이거 됐나 냉정하게 검토해줘" (review this critically to see if it passes).

Frequently Asked Questions about drive-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a deliverable against acceptance criteria?

Run this Skill after the production stage completes. It reads the acceptance criteria and plan from progress.md, tests each criterion against the actual output including edge cases, and issues a pass, conditional, or fail verdict with evidence.

What is a plan compliance audit in a project workflow?

A plan compliance audit compares what the plan promised (structure, order, distribution, reuse) against what was actually produced. Each item is rated complete, partial, missing, done differently, or unverifiable, with reasons noted for gaps.

Can this Skill create or fix deliverables itself?

No, it only inspects and makes small fixes. Major problems are routed back to the production stage (drive-make) or planning stage (drive-plan), and items requiring external decisions are marked as pending rather than forced.

When should I use parallel multi-angle review?

Use parallel review for large or important deliverables where a single pass misses issues. Sub-agents review from different angles such as recipient perspective and adversarial critique; findings confirmed by multiple angles get higher priority.

What happens when a deliverable fails the review?

A failed verdict sends the work back to the appropriate earlier stage with documented reasons. Production gaps return to drive-make, flawed criteria or plans return to drive-plan, and the status in progress.md is updated accordingly.