eda-idea-debate-lab

To brainstorm EDA research ideas, generate at least three candidates anchored in current evidence, then run a structured pro/con debate to surface risks and falsifiable assumptions, producing a decision memo for follow-up experiments.

A structured pro/con debate for EDA ideas systematically surfaces the strongest arguments, objections, and falsifiability for each candidate, ensuring risks are identified before committing to implementation.

Generate falsifiable assumptions for EDA decision memos by applying a structured debate to each idea, explicitly capturing testable hypotheses and risks in idea_decision_memo.md for follow-up experiments.

Structured ideation for EDA risk analysis generates candidate ideas grounded in current evidence, requiring no prior experimental data but needing a structured debate to surface assumptions and risks.

An EDA idea debate workflow produces idea_brainstorm.md, pro_con_debate.md, and idea_decision_memo.md, capturing candidate ideas, arguments, and explicit assumptions for implementation planning.

Avoid using structured debate for EDA idea generation when you need rapid, unstructured exploration without evidence anchoring, as the process requires generating at least three evidence-grounded candidates and formal pro/con evaluation.