editor-compare

Name: editor-compare
Availability: InStock
Author: unfoldingWord

Compare editor-edited ULT/UST with AI output to produce per-verse discrepancy reports.

1|Updated Mar 25, 2026

Search Tags:#glossary #diff-analysis #editor-compare #quick-ref #translation-editing #memory-check

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/unfoldingWord/bp-assistant-skills --skill editor-compare

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: editor-compare
Source: https://github.com/unfoldingWord/bp-assistant-skills/tree/main/.claude/skills/editor-compare
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/unfoldingWord/bp-assistant-skills --skill editor-compare

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill compares editor-edited ULT/UST against AI-generated output to identify vocabulary, structure, and style preferences, and feeds findings back into glossary and quick-ref to guide future translations.

Core Features & Use Cases

Compare editor edits and AI outputs to surface systematic preferences across vocabulary, syntax, and formatting.
Generate per-verse discrepancy reports and cross-chapter patterns to support glossary updates and decision-making during translation projects.
Integrate findings with memory checks against existing decisions and protected canonical sources, escalating conflicts for review.

Quick Start

Run the editor-compare skill on a target book and chapter to generate a discrepancy report and begin the adjudication workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about editor-compare

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I identify editor preferences by comparing translation edits with AI output?▼

You can identify editor preferences by comparing editor-edited ULT/UST texts against AI-generated output. This comparison highlights systematic vocabulary, style, and structural patterns to guide future translation decisions.

How do I generate per-verse discrepancy reports for translation editing?▼

To generate per-verse discrepancy reports, run a comparison on a target book and chapter. The analysis evaluates single-chapter or multi-chapter segments to produce detailed reports for adjudication.

How does diff-analysis handle memory checks against existing translation decisions?▼

Diff-analysis memory checks validate findings against existing project decisions and protected canonical sources. This process ensures consistency and automatically flags any conflicts for escalation and review.

Can I integrate translation editing findings into a glossary and quick-ref for governance?▼

Yes, you can integrate findings into project memory, glossary, and quick-ref for governance. Cross-chapter patterns support these updates, ensuring systematic preferences inform future translation workflows.

What is the best way to surface systematic vocabulary and style preferences during translation editing?▼

The best way to surface systematic vocabulary and style preferences is to compare editor edits with AI outputs. This process identifies formatting and syntax patterns, feeding the results into glossary updates.

Does editor-compare support multi-chapter comparisons for translation projects?▼

Yes, editor-compare supports both single-chapter and multi-chapter comparisons. It applies the analysis across chapters to produce per-verse discrepancy reports and cross-chapter patterns for decision-making.