eng-code-review

Identify defects and vulnerabilities in code through a structured four-pass review.

Updated Apr 14, 2026

Search Tags:#automation #architecture #performance #security #static-analysis #code-review #pull-request

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/viditparashar96/second-brain-claude --skill eng-code-review

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: eng-code-review
Source: https://github.com/viditparashar96/second-brain-claude/tree/main/skills/eng-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/viditparashar96/second-brain-claude --skill eng-code-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automates thorough, multi-pass code reviews to uncover correctness, security, performance, and architectural issues with severity-ranked findings and concrete fixes.

Core Features & Use Cases

4-pass framework: CORRECTNESS, SECURITY, PERFORMANCE, ARCHITECTURE with structured findings.
Product-aware checks: Dynamically apply checks based on project context and inputs.
Actionable fixes: Provide concrete remediation guidance and rationale to streamline fixes.
Review-ready reports: Generate concise, prioritized reports suitable for code reviews and automation.

Quick Start

Provide the PR URL, file path, or diff to trigger the analysis with a single sentence.

Frequently Asked Questions about eng-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate multi-pass code review for pull requests?▼

Multi-pass code review automates defect detection across correctness, security, performance, and architecture. Provide the PR URL, file path, or diff to trigger a structured four-pass analysis with severity-rated findings and actionable fixes.

What is a four-pass code review framework?▼

A four-pass code review framework evaluates software diffs sequentially for correctness, security, performance, and architecture. It generates prioritized, actionable remediation guidance tailored to the specific project context and feature branch changes.

Can I use static analysis to find security vulnerabilities in staged changes?▼

Static analysis can identify security vulnerabilities in staged changes by applying product-aware checks. The review evaluates the diff across four dimensions, returning severity-ranked findings with concrete remediation steps.

Does automated code review provide actionable fixes for architectural issues?▼

Automated code review provides actionable fixes for architectural issues by applying a dedicated analysis pass. It dynamically adjusts checks based on project context and outputs concrete remediation guidance with rationale.

What's the best way to review feature branches for performance and correctness?▼

Reviewing feature branches for performance and correctness requires a structured four-pass workflow. Apply product-aware checks to the branch diff to uncover defects and generate a concise, prioritized report with actionable fixes.

How do I generate review-ready reports from PR diffs?▼

Generate review-ready reports from PR diffs by running the four-pass analysis workflow. The process yields concise, prioritized findings categorized by correctness, security, performance, and architecture, complete with actionable fixes.