eval-harness

Define criteria-driven evaluation workflows for AI code tasks with multiple graders.

1|Updated Apr 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/masermediagroup-stack/CursorSkills --skill eval-harness-masermediagroup-stack
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: eval-harness
Source: https://github.com/masermediagroup-stack/CursorSkills/tree/main/skills-bundle/skills/eval-harness
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/masermediagroup-stack/CursorSkills --skill eval-harness-masermediagroup-stack

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Traditional evaluation of AI tasks is ad hoc and unreliable. This skill provides a formal framework to define success criteria, measure performance, and track progress across model versions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Capability and regression eval support for AI code tasks.
  • Multi-grader approach: code-based, model-based, and human review.
  • Metrics & workflow for iterative improvement and release readiness.

Quick Start

Define an eval workflow and run built-in graders to assess a Claude Code task.

Frequently Asked Questions about eval-harness

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run regression tests for AI code tasks across different model versions?

You can run regression tests for AI tasks by defining an eval workflow with formal success criteria. This framework measures performance and tracks progress across model versions to ensure consistent code assessment results.

What is eval-driven development for AI task assessment?

Eval-driven development is a formal framework that replaces ad hoc evaluation by defining success criteria, measuring performance, and tracking progress across model versions for AI code tasks. It implements capability and regression eval types.

Can I use model-based and human graders together for AI evaluation?

Yes, you can use a multi-grader approach for AI evaluation that includes code-based, model-based, and human review. This combination provides reproducible workflow metrics for iterative improvement and release readiness.

How do I set up a reproducible workflow to evaluate Claude Code sessions?

Define an eval workflow to evaluate Claude Code sessions by applying built-in graders. This creates a reproducible process with defined metrics and storage for iterative improvement and release readiness.

Does this evaluation framework support capability evals for AI development?

Yes, the evaluation framework supports both capability and regression eval types for AI development. It provides metrics and workflows designed to measure performance and track progress across model versions.

Why does my AI task evaluation yield inconsistent results?

AI task evaluation is inconsistent when using ad hoc methods. You can solve this by applying a formal, criteria-driven framework that implements defined metrics, multiple graders, and a reproducible workflow.