evals

Evaluate AI agent performance with customizable scorers and multi-model comparisons.

17.4k|2.3k|Updated Sep 8, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/danielmiessler/LifeOS --skill evals-danielmiessler
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: evals
Source: https://github.com/danielmiessler/LifeOS/tree/main/LifeOS/install/skills/Evals
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/danielmiessler/LifeOS --skill evals-danielmiessler

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires @ai-sdk/anthropic, @langwatch/scenario, ai, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill evaluates AI agents based on transcripts, tool-call sequences, and multi-turn conversations. It utilizes customizable scorers and supports multi-model comparisons for capability and regression testing.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Customizable Scoring: Apply code-based, model-based, and human graders for nuanced evaluation.
  • Multi-Model Comparison: Compare performance across multiple AI models for optimal selection.
  • Use Case: Test an AI agent's capability and consistency in different scenarios, comparing Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, and more.

Quick Start

Use the evals skill to run a multi-model comparison for the "newsletter summary" use case.

Frequently Asked Questions about evals

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate AI agent performance across multiple models like Claude and GPT-4?

AI agent evaluation utilizes customizable scorers to compare performance across multiple models like Claude and GPT-4. You apply code-based, model-based, and human graders to assess transcripts, tool-call sequences, and multi-turn conversations.

What is the best way to score multi-turn conversation transcripts for AI agents?

Scoring multi-turn conversation transcripts is best handled by applying customizable graders. You can utilize code-based, model-based, and human graders to perform nuanced assessment of tool-call sequences and conversational consistency.

Does this AI evaluation framework support model-based and human graders?

Yes, this AI evaluation framework supports model-based and human graders alongside code-based scoring. This combination allows for nuanced assessment of agent transcripts, tool-call sequences, and multi-turn conversations.

Can I run regression testing on AI agents using custom scoring criteria?

Yes, you can run regression testing on AI agents using custom scoring criteria. The framework evaluates agent consistency across different scenarios, applying code-based, model-based, and human graders for comprehensive capability testing.

Do I need a specific framework to run multi-model comparison evaluations?

Yes, you need Anthropic's "Demystifying Evals for AI Agents" framework for consistent execution. This provides the foundational structure required to run multi-model comparisons and evaluate AI agent performance accurately.