evals

Evaluate AI agent transcripts with code-based, model-based, and human graders.

2|Updated Apr 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ylxai/hafiportrait-saas --skill evals-ylxai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: evals
Source: https://github.com/ylxai/hafiportrait-saas/tree/main/.kiro/skills/Evals
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ylxai/hafiportrait-saas --skill evals-ylxai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires @ai-sdk/anthropic, @langwatch/scenario, ai, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating AI agents, allowing users to conduct rigorous assessments of agent capabilities, quality, and reliability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Grader Evaluation: Supports three types of graders: code-based, model-based, and human.
  • Evaluation Types: Offers capability and regression evaluations with specific pass targets.
  • Workflows: Integrates with various workflows such as running evaluations, comparing models and prompts, creating judges and use cases, running scenarios, and viewing results.
  • Domain Patterns: Pre-configured for coding, conversational, research, and computer-use agent types.
  • Integration: Works with THE ALGORITHM ISC rows for automated verification.

Quick Start

Run a comprehensive evaluation of the 'Research' skill using the following command:

bun run ~/.claude/skills/Evals/EvalServer/cli-run.ts --use-case Research

Frequently Asked Questions about evals

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate AI agent performance across multi-turn conversations?

AI agent evaluation uses three grader types: code-based deterministic checks, model-based nuanced assessment, and human gold standard verification. It analyzes agent transcripts and tool-call sequences to measure capability and regression with pass@k scoring.

What's the best way to run automated regression tests for AI agents?

Running regression tests for AI agents is best handled through capability evaluations with specific pass targets. This framework automates verification using THE ALGORITHM ISC rows and supports pre-configured domain patterns for coding, conversational, research, and computer-use agents.

Does this AI evaluation framework support Anthropic's Evals Protocol?

Yes, this AI evaluation framework is optimized for Anthropic's Evals Protocol. It integrates with @ai-sdk/anthropic and @langwatch/scenario to run multi-turn scenarios and automated verification.

Can I use model-based grading for nuanced prompt engineering evaluation?

Yes, model-based grading is supported for nuanced prompt engineering evaluation. It complements code-based deterministic checks and human gold standard grading to assess complex multi-turn agent behaviors.

What dependencies do I need to run AI agent evaluation scenarios?

To run AI agent evaluation scenarios, you need @ai-sdk/anthropic, @langwatch/scenario, and the ai package. These dependencies enable multi-turn scenario execution and model-based grading.

Why use code-based versus model-based graders for agent testing?

Code-based graders provide deterministic, automated verification for agent testing, while model-based graders handle nuanced, subjective assessments. Combining both with human gold standard checks ensures comprehensive evaluation across multi-turn conversations.