skills.rest
masanao-ohba
masanao-ohbaCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

evaluation-criteria

Define objective evaluation criteria with scoring rules and severity levels.

2|Updated Oct 19, 2025
Search Tags:#metrics#evaluation#scoring#assessment#deliverables#criteria
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/masanao-ohba/claude-manifests --skill evaluation-criteria
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: evaluation-criteria
Source: https://github.com/masanao-ohba/claude-manifests/tree/main/skills/generic/evaluation-criteria
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/masanao-ohba/claude-manifests --skill evaluation-criteria

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill defines and applies objective evaluation criteria to assess deliverables consistently across projects.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Dimensions: Completeness, Correctness, Quality, Security, and Performance with structured criteria.
  • Scoring & Feedback: Clear pass/fail rules, severity levels, and actionable feedback mechanisms.
  • Use Case: Applied to software releases, research reports, or product specs to generate standardized evaluation reports and improve quality.

Quick Start

Provide a set of deliverables and context to generate an evaluation plan and scoring rubrics.

Frequently Asked Questions about evaluation-criteria

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I standardize deliverable evaluation criteria for software releases and research reports?▼

To standardize deliverable evaluation, you define objective criteria across dimensions like completeness, correctness, quality, security, and performance to generate consistent assessment reports and scoring rubrics.

What is the best way to set up scoring rules and severity levels for product spec reviews?▼

Setting up scoring rules and severity levels for product spec reviews requires defining clear pass/fail rules and structured criteria to generate actionable feedback mechanisms and standardized evaluation outputs.

Can I use structured evaluation dimensions to automate quality assessment across different project types?▼

You can use structured evaluation dimensions to automate quality assessment by specifying criteria, scoring rules, and structured output formats applicable across software, research, and product work for consistent auditing.

How do I generate an evaluation plan and scoring rubrics for a set of deliverables?▼

To generate an evaluation plan and scoring rubrics, you provide your deliverables and context to define objective criteria, severity levels, and structured output formats for standardized reviews and feedback.

What evaluation dimensions should I include when assessing software deliverables for security and performance?▼

When assessing software deliverables for security and performance, include structured evaluation dimensions covering completeness, correctness, quality, security, and performance to enable consistent and objective reviews.

Related Skills

Explore More Data & Analytics Skills→
jimmc414jimmc414
557

Scholar Evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work across eight defined dimensions with scoring rubrics.

Community
Advanced
ovachieverovachiever
52

scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework with dimension-based scoring.

Community
Advanced
expanso-ioexpanso-io

expanso-aggregate-time-windows

Performs time-window aggregations on metrics and analytics data using Expanso.

Official
Advanced
KameniAlexNeaKameniAlexNea

code-review

Review code and deliverables for functional correctness and quality standards.

Community
Intermediate