What problem does it solve? Organizers opening a call for papers face interconnected decisions - timeline, form fields, anonymization posture, published criteria, speaker perks - where a wrong default (a too-short window, an unconfirmed travel promise, blind-review theater) damages speaker trust and next year's submission pipeline. ## Core Features & Use Cases - CFP Timeline Planning: Works back from the event date to set open, close, review, and program-announcement anchors, with a sourced floor (close 6-8 weeks out, open at least a month) below which the open CFP is deleted in favor of invited speakers. - Submission Form Design: Builds per-format forms with split title, capped abstract, and separate why-me fields, a per-person submission cap, and a tooling capability checklist. - Review Posture and Published Criteria: Decides between named, opt-in anonymous, and mandatory blind review, and writes the actual selection criteria into the call itself. - Speaker Benefits and Support: States the confirmed free-ticket floor, travel-grant policy shape, honorarium calibration points, and first-time-speaker support rungs. - Use Case: A first-edition community conference nine months out asks for the full CFP setup; the skill produces a long-window timeline, mentorship plan, form fields, published criteria, and a benefits statement validated section by section before publication. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to design the call for papers for your conference, providing the event date, chosen session formats, and confirmed speaker budget.
