evidence-selfloop

To identify evidence gaps in research writing, you analyze evidence artifacts to detect missing citations, insufficient snippets, and weak comparisons. This diagnoses issues in data extraction, binding, and mapping stages to prevent drafting hollow or unsubstantiated prose.

Your research draft feels thin due to evidence deficiencies in upstream extraction, binding, or mapping stages. Analyzing evidence artifacts pinpoints the exact root cause, generating actionable upstream tasks needed to strengthen supporting data before prose generation.

To fix missing citations and weak evidence comparisons before writing, run an evidence gap analysis on your research artifacts. This generates a prioritized TODO list of specific upstream tasks, ensuring you resolve evidence deficiencies before generating prose.

The best way to diagnose root causes of insufficient evidence is to analyze research artifacts for binding and mapping stage issues. This pinpoints whether evidence problems stem from upstream data extraction or mapping, generating actionable tasks to improve writing quality.

You should run an evidence gap analysis in your research workflow when a draft section feels blocked due to lack of evidence. Prioritize fixing these evidence deficiencies before prose generation to prevent creating hollow or unsubstantiated content.